Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 5, 2026

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
11:51

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

Published on: February 10, 2014

Hard tissue implant interface.

T Albrektsson1

  • 1Department of Biomaterials, University of Gothenburg, Sweden. tomas.albrektsson@biomaterials.gu.se

Australian Dental Journal
|August 9, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Two-piece Zirconia Implants: An Office based Retrospective Study with up to 7 and mean 3 Year Follow-Up.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2025
Same author

Osteoimmune regulation underlies oral implant osseointegration and its perturbation.

Frontiers in immunology·2023
Same author

Is the intake of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors associated with an increased risk of dental implant failure?

International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery·2017
Same author

Response to the Letter to the Editor: "Factors Influencing Early Dental Implant Failures"

Journal of dental research·2016
Same author

Bruxism and dental implant failures: a multilevel mixed effects parametric survival analysis approach.

Journal of oral rehabilitation·2016
Same author

Turned versus anodised dental implants: a meta-analysis.

Journal of oral rehabilitation·2016
Same journal

Perspectives of Oral Health Practitioners Working in Rural New South Wales: Culture, Wellbeing and Workforce Sustainability.

Australian dental journal·2026
Same journal

Misquoting of Scientific Literature.

Australian dental journal·2026
Same journal

Surface Physical and Mechanical Properties of Short Fibre Reinforced Composite Resins in Direct Restorative Dentistry: A Systematic Review.

Australian dental journal·2026
Same journal

Marginal and Internal Fit, Surface Roughness and Fracture Resistance of Hybrid Dental Crown Materials Fabricated With Milling and 3D-Printing Systems: An In Vitro Study.

Australian dental journal·2026
Same journal

The Australian and New Zealand Dental Implant Registry: Regulatory Requirements and Registry Development.

Australian dental journal·2026
Same journal

Patterns of Surgical Prophylaxis Prescribing for Dentoalveolar Procedures in Australian Hospitals: 2016-2022.

Australian dental journal·2026
See all related articles

Osseointegration relies on implant material, design, and surface characteristics for successful bone bonding. While micro- and nano-scale surface irregularities are crucial, long-term stability is generally high, with peri-implantitis affecting only a small percentage.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Dental Implantology
  • Tissue Engineering

Background:

  • The osseointegrated interface involves bone bonding to implants, with varying degrees of calcification observed at different resolutions.
  • Interfacial bone reactions are influenced by implant material, design, surface characteristics, and clinical factors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the factors influencing osseointegration and the stability of the implant-bone interface.
  • To discuss the role of surface characteristics and potential bonding mechanisms in oral implantology.

Main Methods:

  • Review of light and ultrastructural studies on osseointegrated interfaces.
  • Analysis of factors affecting bone reactions to implants, including material, design, and surface topography.
  • Discussion of clinical outcomes and long-term stability.

More Related Videos

Multi-Scale Modification of Metallic Implants With Pore Gradients, Polyelectrolytes and Their Indirect Monitoring In vivo
12:19

Multi-Scale Modification of Metallic Implants With Pore Gradients, Polyelectrolytes and Their Indirect Monitoring In vivo

Published on: July 1, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 5, 2026

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
11:51

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

Published on: February 10, 2014

Multi-Scale Modification of Metallic Implants With Pore Gradients, Polyelectrolytes and Their Indirect Monitoring In vivo
12:19

Multi-Scale Modification of Metallic Implants With Pore Gradients, Polyelectrolytes and Their Indirect Monitoring In vivo

Published on: July 1, 2013

Main Results:

  • Osseointegration involves 60-70% bone contact at the light microscopic level, with proteoglycan layers at the ultrastructural interface.
  • Commercially pure titanium and threaded screw designs are common in oral implantology.
  • Micron-sized surface irregularities are essential for osseointegration; nanometer irregularities may enhance bone ingrowth, though clinical relevance is uncertain.
  • Long-term stability is generally good, with peri-implantitis affecting approximately 2% of implants over 10-20 years.

Conclusions:

  • Successful osseointegration is multifactorial, heavily dependent on implant surface characteristics and design.
  • Current evidence supports biomechanical bonding as the primary mechanism for oral implant anchorage.
  • The long-term stability of oral implants is robust, with peri-implantitis being a relatively infrequent complication.