Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sex differences in language processing: functional MRI methodological considerations.

Greg S Harrington1, Sarah Tomaszewski Farias

  • 1Central Texas Veterans Health Care System, Austin, Texas, USA. Gregory.Harrington@va.gov

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging : JMRI
|May 28, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The association between daily real-time assessment of subjective cognitive function and objective cognition using ecological momentary assessment.

Neuropsychology·2026
Same author

Six-month outcomes of a multidomain RCT lifestyle and memory support intervention among older adults with subjective cognitive decline (Brain Boosters).

International psychogeriatrics·2026
Same author

Aging and resilience in Vietnamese American older adults: Evidence from the Vietnamese Insights into Cognitive Aging Program.

International psychogeriatrics·2026
Same author

Development and validation of a harmonized memory score for multicenter Alzheimer's disease and related dementia research.

Alzheimer's research & therapy·2026
Same author

Lifecourse socioeconomic status and subjective cognitive decline among diverse older adults.

The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences·2026
Same author

A bibliometric analysis of Neuropsychology's published corpus (1987-2024): How has the science evolved, and does study content impact citation rates?

Neuropsychology·2026
Same journal

Structural MRI Volumetry Index for Differentiation of Progressive Supranuclear Palsy From Parkinson's Disease and Multiple System Atrophy by Automatic Segmentation: A Comparison With Magnetic Resonance Parkinsonism Index.

Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI·2026
Same journal

Integrating nnU-Net Segmentation and Clinical-Radiomics for Multicenter MRI-Based Assessment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma Grade and Ki-67 Expression.

Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI·2026
Same journal

Optimization of Respiratory Training Methods for Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI·2026
Same journal

Editorial for "Voxel-Wise Radiomics Habitat Analysis of Post-Treatment Gliomas for Noninvasive Differentiation of True Progression and Pseudoprogression".

Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI·2026
Same journal

Multiparametric Quantitative MRI of Peripheral Nerves to Differentiate Demyelinating From Axonal Polyneuropathies.

Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI·2026
Same journal

Mapping Fatty Acid Composition in the Human Knee: Short-Term Repeatability at 3T.

Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI·2026
See all related articles

Neuroimaging analysis methods significantly impact findings on sex differences in language processing. Study results help explain inconsistencies in previous functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) research.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psycholinguistics

Background:

  • Previous neuroimaging studies on sex differences in language processing have yielded inconsistent results.
  • Understanding these discrepancies is crucial for accurate interpretation of brain function.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how different analysis methods and language tasks influence the detection of sex differences in brain activation.
  • To clarify inconsistencies in prior functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) research.

Main Methods:

  • Compared fMRI activation between 19 men and 21 women across five language tasks.
  • Utilized individual (laterality, activation volume) and group analyses.
  • Examined effects of task type and analytical methodology on sex difference detection.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Group analyses showed sex-specific activation in the left pars orbitalis (men) and right insula (women).
  • Individual analyses revealed significant sex effects in small regions of interest (e.g., insula, temporal lobe) but not in larger regions.
  • Methodology, including region of interest selection, influenced the identification of sex differences.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of analysis method and task significantly affects the observed sex differences in language processing.
  • Findings provide a partial explanation for the heterogeneity of results in previous fMRI studies on language and sex.