Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development01:19

Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development

Kohlberg's theory of moral development uses the Heinz dilemma — a thought experiment in which a man, Heinz, must decide whether to steal an unaffordable drug to save his dying wife — to illustrate the evolution of moral reasoning. This framework, divided into three levels with two stages, highlights how individuals' understanding of right and wrong becomes increasingly complex.
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal consequences. In Stage...
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence categorization, a person will feel...
Cognitive Dissonance01:38

Cognitive Dissonance

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
Motivational Bias01:25

Motivational Bias

Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory01:20

Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory

Cognitive psychologist Richard Lazarus proposed the cognitive-mediational theory of emotions, which emphasizes how individuals' assessments of stressors significantly affect their experience of stress. According to Lazarus, the stress response is determined by a two-step appraisal process: primary appraisal and secondary appraisal. These cognitive appraisals help individuals evaluate the potential impact of a stressor and determine the adequacy of their coping resources.
Primary Appraisal:...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Moral foundations in autistic people and people with systemizing minds.

Molecular autism·2024
Same author

Ownership is (likely to be) a moral foundation.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2023
Same author

Puritanism needs purity, and moral psychology needs pluralism.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2023
Same author

Morality beyond the WEIRD: How the nomological network of morality varies across cultures.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2023
Same author

Specification curve analysis shows that social media use is linked to poor mental health, especially among girls.

Acta psychologica·2022
Same author

Social threat indirectly increases moral condemnation via thwarting fundamental social needs.

Scientific reports·2021
Same journal

Metacognitive and Interpersonal Intellectual Humility Are Asymmetrically Associated with Well-Being.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same journal

Intergroup Contact and Belonging Among Ethiopian Jews in Ethiopia.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same journal

A Taxonomy of Data Synthesis.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same journal

When and Why Beliefs About the Causes of a Policy Problem Predict Policy Support.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same journal

Prospects of Downward Mobility Cause Status Anxiety and Life Dissatisfaction.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same journal

Fluency as a Cue to Authenticity.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

Disgust as embodied moral judgment.

Simone Schnall1, Jonathan Haidt, Gerald L Clore

  • 1School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, UK. simone.schnall@plymouth.ac.uk

Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin
|May 29, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Disgust, a visceral feeling, significantly increases the severity of moral judgments. This effect is specific and linked to individual sensitivity to bodily sensations, highlighting the role of "gut feelings" in morality.

More Related Videos

Observational Fear as a Model of Affective Empathy in Mice
04:14

Observational Fear as a Model of Affective Empathy in Mice

Published on: November 22, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

Observational Fear as a Model of Affective Empathy in Mice
04:14

Observational Fear as a Model of Affective Empathy in Mice

Published on: November 22, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Moral Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Affective Science

Background:

  • Moral judgment is a complex cognitive process.
  • The influence of emotions, particularly disgust, on moral decision-making is an area of ongoing research.
  • Understanding the specific mechanisms linking emotions to moral judgments is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how and for whom disgust influences moral judgment.
  • To determine if disgust specifically heightens the severity of moral judgments.
  • To explore the role of interoceptive sensitivity in mediating the disgust-moral judgment link.

Main Methods:

  • Four experiments were conducted to induce disgust through various methods: olfactory (bad smell), environmental (disgusting room), experiential (recalling disgusting events), and visual (video).
  • Participants made moral judgments under induced disgust conditions and compared to control groups.
  • Sensitivity to bodily sensations was measured to assess its moderating role.

Main Results:

  • Across all four experiments, induced disgust significantly increased the severity of moral judgments compared to controls.
  • Disgust had a distinct effect on moral judgment compared to sadness.
  • The impact of disgust on moral judgment severity was moderated by participants' sensitivity to their own bodily sensations.

Conclusions:

  • Disgust is a specific emotion that can intensify moral judgments.
  • The influence of disgust on moral judgment is not universal but depends on individual differences in interoceptive awareness.
  • These findings underscore the importance of "gut feelings" and physiological responses in shaping moral cognition.