Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Clinical and pharmacological management of a high risk diabetic population undergoing percutaneous coronary
S Delcré1, M Anselmino, C Moretti
1Cardiology Unit, San Giovanni Battista-Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Insights
Optimal management of diabetes mellitus (DM) and coronary artery disease (CAD) is crucial. This study found suboptimal guideline adherence in DM patients post-percutaneous coronary intervention, necessitating improved clinical care to reduce cardiovascular events.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Endocrinology
- Clinical Medicine
Background:
- Optimal management of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and coronary artery disease (CAD) is essential for reducing cardiovascular events.
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a common procedure for CAD, and its outcomes in diabetic patients require careful monitoring.
- Adherence to current guidelines for DM management in CAD patients undergoing PCI is critical for patient prognosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the adherence to the latest guidelines for managing diabetes mellitus in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
- To stratify DM patients based on their diabetes management quality after PCI.
- To identify areas for improvement in the clinical care of diabetic patients with coronary artery disease.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of consecutive type 2 DM patients undergoing balloon angioplasty with stent implantation were followed.
- Data collected included sociodemographic details, medical history, pharmaceutical treatment, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events.
- Clinical variables assessed quality of DM management, monitoring, and adherence to guidelines over a mean follow-up of 39 months.
Main Results:
- Despite high risk, 36% of patients received insulin with poor glycemic control (HbA1c >7% in 59%).
- Clinical management was unsatisfactory: only 41% achieved HbA1c targets, 36% blood pressure targets, and 22% BMI targets.
- Strict guideline adherence was observed in only 26% of patients; 36% were severely distant from recommendations.
Conclusions:
- The quality of diabetes mellitus management requires significant improvement to reduce high cardiovascular event rates in patients with coronary artery disease.
- Current clinical practices fall short of recommended guidelines for managing diabetic patients undergoing PCI.
- Enhanced clinical strategies are imperative to optimize outcomes for this high-risk patient population.
Aim:
An optimal clinical management and monitoring of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and coronary artery disease (CAD) has proved to reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events. The main aim of this report is to verify the adherence to the latest guidelines recommendations in a considerable group of DM patients undergoing a percutaneous coronary intervention, stratifying the population by the degree of the DM management.
Methods:
The patients recruited were those consecutive, unselected patients with type 2 DM undergoing a balloon angioplasty followed by a stent implantation, between July 2002 and December 2004. Follow-up was completed in 220 patients at 39+/-8.7 months. The follow-up interview concerned sociodemographic details, medical history, pharmaceutical treatment, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events and clinical variables regarding the quality of DM management and monitoring.
Results:
Thirty-six percent of these high short and long-term risk patients received insulin treatment at index hospitalization despite a poor glucometabolic control (59% presented HbA1c >7%, mean 8+/-1.26%). The clinical management of the 204 (80%) survivors over time proved overall unsatisfactory: HbA1c, arterial blood pressure and body mass index uncommonly achieved the recommended targets (41%, 36% and 22% of the patients respectively). The DM monitoring revealed satisfactory, with the exception of the diabetic foot monitoring (performed in 38% of the patients). Concerning guideline adherence 26% of the patients proved to adhere strictly, while 38% and 36% were mildly and severely distant from these requirements.
Conclusion:
Quality of DM management absolutely necessitates to be improved to attempt reducing the high cardiovascular event rates.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management