Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

10:39
The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
Published on: May 3, 2018
The line copy task for kinesthesia and internal movement representation: application in children
Bouwien Smits-Engelsman1, Jacques Duysens
1Faculty of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, K.U. Leuven, Belgium. bouwiensmits@hotmail.com
Human Movement Science
|June 3, 2008
Summary
This study introduces the Line Copy Test (LICT) to assess kinesthetic and mental rotation abilities in children. Younger children showed more spatial calibration errors, suggesting developing kinesthetic representations influence movement consistency.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Psychology
- Motor Control
- Neuroscience
Background:
- Understanding the development of motor control in children is crucial for identifying learning disabilities.
- Kinesthetic perception and mental rotation are key components of motor skill acquisition.
- Existing tests may not fully capture the interplay between sensory feedback and internal representations in movement reproduction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce and validate a novel test, the Line Copy Test (LICT), assessing kinesthesia and mental rotation in cyclic movements.
- To investigate developmental changes in spatial calibration and movement consistency in children aged 7-11.
- To explore the relationship between the LICT and other measures of motor and kinesthetic acuity.
Main Methods:
- The Line Copy Test (LICT) involved reproducing cyclic movements, both along a direct path (S-part) and orthogonally to a mentally represented path (O-part).
- Participants included 58 children aged 7-11 years.
- Measures included Trajectory Length Error (TLE) for spatial calibration and Variable Error (VE) for movement consistency, alongside correlations with the Kinesthetic Acuity Test and a pegboard task.
Main Results:
- Trajectory Length Error (TLE) and Variable Error (VE) were highest in the youngest children for the S-part, indicating developmental effects on spatial calibration and consistency.
- While TLE was significantly larger in the O-part (rotated task) across all ages, VE was notably smaller, suggesting distinct control mechanisms.
- No significant developmental effect was observed in the O-part, implying changes in internal model use occur beyond the studied age range.
Conclusions:
- The LICT effectively differentiates between kinesthetic and mental rotation abilities in children's movement reproduction.
- Developmental increases in movement variability in the S-part may stem from unstable kinesthetic representations in young children.
- The lack of developmental changes in the O-part suggests that significant shifts in internal model utilization happen after age 11.
