Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
Published on: July 5, 2015
The perceptual consequences of the attentional bias: evidence for distractor removal
Matthias Niemeier1, Vaughan V W Singh, Matthew Keough
1Department of Psychology, University of Toronto at Scarborough, 1265 Military Trail, Toronto, M1C 1A4, Canada. niemeier@utsc.utoronto.ca
Abstract:
A fundamental question of attentional research concerns the perceptual consequences of attention. Spatial attention can enhance stimuli within the focus of attention relative to stimuli outside; or attention can remove the influence of distracting stimuli and other forms of external noise inside the focus of attention. It is known that both strategies apply depending on how attention is cued to a location in space. Here we asked which strategy applies in an uncued situation in which people show a spontaneous bias of attention to the left side. To measure bias, we used a gratingscales task with stimuli corrupted by pixel noise. If biased attention resulted in biased stimulus enhancement its effect should be largest when there is little noise or few distractors within the attended region, and bias should decline with increasing noise. If, however, bias caused distractors to be removed asymmetrically, larger bias should show up with noisy stimuli. We found that bias rose exponentially as noise increased, in agreement with the external noise removal model, and we found evidence that noise modified interhemispheric competition between attentional systems. Our data offer new insights into the neural mechanisms of the right-hemisphere dominance in spatial and attentional tasks.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Confirmation Biases
Halo Effect
Actor-Observer Effect
Correspondence Bias
Factors Affecting Perception
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
The Availability Heuristic

