Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Strength of evidence, extraevidentiary influence, and the liberation hypothesis: data from the field
Dennis J Devine1, Jennifer Buddenbaum, Stephanie Houp
1Department of Psychology, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, LD 124, 402 N. Blackford Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46202-3275, USA. ddevine@iupui.edu
Abstract:
To examine relationships between strength of evidence (SOE) and extraevidentiary variables in the context of Kalven and Zeisel's (The American Jury, 1966) liberation hypothesis, post-trial questionnaire data were collected from judges, attorneys, and jurors associated with 179 criminal jury trials. SOE ratings were strongly correlated with jury verdicts on the three most serious charges against the defendant, and several extraevidentiary variables (i.e., pretrial publicity, trial complexity, charge severity, and foreperson demographics) were moderately correlated with verdicts. Extraevidentiary-verdict relationships remained significant when SOE was controlled, although extraevidentiary variables yielded only modest improvement in classification accuracy beyond SOE. In partial support of the liberation hypothesis, several case-related extraevidentiary variables were significantly related to jury verdicts only when the prosecution's evidence was rated as moderately strong.
Related Concept Videos
Social Proof
The Scientific Method
Statistical Significance
Cause and Effect
Relationship Formation
Archival Research
