Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

When is motion 'motion'?

Erik Blaser1, George Sperling

  • 1University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA 02125-3393, USA. erik.blaser@umb.edu

Perception
|June 13, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers explored conceptual motion stimuli, like shifting words, which mimic perceptual motion but lack a motion sensation. This study contrasts these abstract stimuli with traditional visual motion to understand motion perception differences.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

How Much Do You Remember When It's up to You? Measuring Memory Use Without Response Bias in Young Children.

Developmental science·2026
Same author

School changes minds: A meta-analysis shows that schooling modestly improves children's executive functions.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2025
Same author

How attention and working memory work together in the pursuit of goals: The development of the sampling-remembering trade-off.

Developmental review : DR·2025
Same author

The Extended Mind in Young Children: Cost-Dependent Trade-Off Between External and Internal Memory.

Psychological science·2025
Same author

My Tablet's About to Go Dead! 5- to 6-year-old Children Adjust Their Cognitive Strategies Depending on Whether An External Resource is Reliably Available.

Cognitive development·2025
Same journal

Benchmarking spatial discrimination thresholds of two-frame motion defined forms compared to luminance and stereoscopic defined forms.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The effect of face masks on the perception of trustworthiness and competence in individuals with autistic traits.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The importance of external features for categorizing ethnicity: can Koreans identify Korean, Japanese, and Chinese faces?

Perception·2026
Same journal

Interoception, alexithymia, and motor congruency: Psychological drivers of body ownership in virtual reality.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The frustration of a small <i>n</i>.

Perception·2026
Same journal

Why do we have two eyes.

Perception·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Visual motion perception has evolved towards abstract stimuli, including third-order stimuli guided by attention.
  • Conceptual motion stimuli, such as moving text or faces, function analogously to perceptual motion stimuli.
  • Despite shared computational underpinnings, conceptual motion does not evoke a sensation of movement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the characteristics of conceptual motion stimuli.
  • To compare psychophysical differences between perceptual and conceptual motion.
  • To explore the limits of abstract motion perception.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of a luminance-based perceptual motion stimulus with a semantic-based conceptual motion stimulus.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Psychophysical assessment of direction-of-motion judgments for both stimulus types.
  • Analysis of automatic consequences typically associated with motion detection.

    • Main Results:

    • Conceptual motion stimuli allow for direction judgments similar to perceptual motion.
    • Conceptual motion stimuli do not elicit the subjective experience of motion.
    • Differences in automatic motion detection consequences were observed between stimulus types.

    Conclusions:

    • Conceptual motion represents a highly abstract form of motion perception.
    • The study highlights dissociations between motion computation and the sensation of movement.
    • Findings contribute to understanding the diverse mechanisms underlying visual motion perception.