Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluating perceptual performance with pixel-based tactile images.

IEEE transactions on haptics·2026
Same author

Feasibility and optimization of a novel, cranially-mounted deep brain stimulation device for children with epilepsy - the CADET Pilot study.

Brain stimulation·2026
Same author

Principles of Physiologic Closed-Loop Controllers in Neuromodulation.

Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society·2026
Same author

Effects of Introducing the Bbrainklok as a Digital External Memory Aid on Prospective Memory, Apathy and Autonomy in Individuals with Korsakoff's Syndrome.

Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment·2026
Same author

Wayfinding with Impaired Vision: Preferences for Cues, Strategies, and Aids (Part II-Perspectives from Orientation and Mobility Instructors).

Brain sciences·2026
Same author

Wayfinding with Impaired Vision: Preferences for Cues, Strategies, and Aids (Part I-Perspectives from Visually Impaired Individuals).

Brain sciences·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
05:43

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

Differential effects of non-informative vision and visual interference on haptic spatial processing.

Robert Volcic1, Joram J van Rheede, Albert Postma

  • 1Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 5, 3584 CC, Utrecht, The Netherlands. r.volcic@phys.uu.nl

Experimental Brain Research
|June 17, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Non-informative vision enhances haptic spatial processing by influencing reference frames. Visual interference also impacts haptic performance, suggesting cross-modal interactions shape spatial representations.

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator (TSPAS)
04:40

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator (TSPAS)

Published on: July 30, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
05:43

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator (TSPAS)
04:40

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator (TSPAS)

Published on: July 30, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Human Perception
  • Multisensory Integration

Background:

  • Haptic spatial processing relies on allocentric and egocentric reference frames.
  • Understanding cross-modal influences on spatial perception is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how non-informative vision and visual interference affect haptic spatial processing.
  • To examine the role of reference frames in haptic perception.
  • To explore the impact of visual cues on egocentric biases.

Main Methods:

  • A haptic parallelity task was used to assess egocentric biases.
  • Experiments involved non-informative vision and visual interference.
  • Gazing direction and hemispace presentation of haptic information were analyzed.

Main Results:

  • Non-informative vision improved haptic spatial processing.
  • Visual interference parametrically influenced haptic performance.
  • No significant effects of gazing direction or hemispace were found.

Conclusions:

  • Spatial representations are shaped by direct cross-modal interactions.
  • Individual differences in haptic perception modulate visual modality effects.
  • Reference frame interactions are key to understanding visual-haptic integration.