Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Surgical Swine Model of Chronic Cardiac Ischemia Treated by Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Published on: March 27, 2018
Amiodarone protects diabetics and non-diabetics undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting equally
Lars R Zebis1, Thomas D Christensen, Henrik F Thomsen
1Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery & Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Aarhus N, Denmark. LRZ@post.tele.dk
Insights
Amiodarone prophylaxis is equally effective for diabetics and non-diabetics in preventing atrial fibrillation. However, diabetic patients experienced a longer hospital stay, indicating a potential complication beyond arrhythmia risk.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Endocrinology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Diabetes mellitus is a growing global health concern.
- Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common complication following cardiac surgery.
- Diabetic patients often have poorer outcomes and longer hospital stays after cardiac procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess amiodarone prophylaxis efficacy in diabetic versus non-diabetic patients.
- To determine if diabetic status influences atrial fibrillation risk.
- To evaluate the impact of diabetes on in-hospital stay duration post-cardiac procedures.
Main Methods:
- Subgroup analysis from a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial.
- Comparison of atrial fibrillation incidence at 30 days.
- Analysis of in-hospital stay length between diabetic and non-diabetic cohorts.
Main Results:
- Atrial fibrillation incidence was similar: 22% in diabetics vs. 17% in non-diabetics (p=0.41).
- Amiodarone prophylaxis demonstrated comparable efficacy in both groups.
- Diabetic patients had a significantly prolonged in-hospital stay (25% longer).
Conclusions:
- Amiodarone prophylaxis is equally effective for diabetic and non-diabetic patients regarding atrial fibrillation prevention.
- Diabetic status does not increase atrial fibrillation risk in this context.
- Diabetes is associated with increased length of in-hospital stay, independent of AF development.
Objective:
To evaluate amiodarone prophylaxis in diabetics and non-diabetics. Further to clarify whether the risk of developing atrial fibrillation is higher for diabetics than non-diabetic patients, and to evaluate whether the diabetic status has any influence on the length of in-hospital stay.
Design:
Subgroup analysis within a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial.
Results:
At 30 days of follow-up atrial fibrillation was equally frequent among diabetics (22%) and non-diabetics (17%) (p =0.41). The length of in-hospital stay for diabetics was prolonged with 25% (9%; 45%). The prophylactic amiodarone was found equally efficient in diabetics and non-diabetics, as the relative risk ratios were 1.2 (0.4-5.4) and 2.0 (0.3-12.5), respectively.
Conclusions:
Diabetics and non-diabetics had the same effect of the amiodarone prophylaxis regime. Atrial fibrillation developed equally among diabetics and non-diabetics, but the length of stay was prolonged for diabetics.
Related Concept Videos
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class III Agents as Potassium Channel Blockers
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers
Class 1A Antiarrhythmic Drugs: These drugs work by moderately blocking sodium channels,...
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Antianginal Drugs: Calcium Channel Blockers and Ranolazine
CCBs, a diverse class that includes dihydropyridines (nifedipine) and diphenylalkylamines (verapamil and diltiazem), exert their effect by blocking calcium channels in cardiac and smooth muscle cells. This...
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
