Identifying cross contaminants and specimen mix-ups in surgical pathology

Jennifer L Hunt1

  • 1Department of Anatomic Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. huntj2@ccf.org

Insights

Maintaining patient identity in pathology labs is crucial. This review proposes a standardized approach, including DNA fingerprinting, to address specimen mix-ups and ensure accurate diagnostic pathology.

Area of Science:

  • Pathology
  • Laboratory Medicine
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Patient identity is paramount in diagnostic pathology, highlighted by Joint Commission Laboratory Goals.
  • Despite quality assurance, specimen mix-ups and contamination remain potential risks.
  • Lack of a standardized approach complicates the analysis of compromised samples.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a standardized workflow for managing potential specimen identity issues in pathology.
  • To detail methods for ensuring accurate sample identification throughout laboratory processing.
  • To explore the utility of DNA fingerprinting in confirming tissue and sample identity.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current quality assurance practices in pathology laboratories.
  • Proposal of a multi-step standardized approach: clinical correlation, laboratory correlation, and laboratory analysis.
  • Detailed discussion of DNA fingerprinting techniques for molecular sample identification.

Main Results:

  • A standardized approach can mitigate challenges arising from specimen mix-ups.
  • DNA fingerprinting offers a robust method for verifying tissue and sample identity.
  • Implementing this standardized workflow enhances diagnostic accuracy and patient safety.

Conclusions:

  • A standardized approach integrating clinical, laboratory, and molecular data is essential for reliable pathology diagnostics.
  • DNA fingerprinting serves as a critical tool for resolving identity discrepancies.
  • Adoption of these strategies improves patient safety and laboratory integrity.