Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Optimization, Design and Avoiding Pitfalls in Manual Multiplex Fluorescent Immunohistochemistry
Published on: July 26, 2019
Identifying cross contaminants and specimen mix-ups in surgical pathology
1Department of Anatomic Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. huntj2@ccf.org
Abstract:
Maintaining patient identity throughout laboratory processing is critical for any diagnostic pathology laboratory. It has also been listed as a main National Patient Safety Goal for the Joint Commission Laboratory Goals. Most pathology facilities have excellent quality assurance programs and initiatives that include multiple checkpoints to ensure that specimen identity is carefully maintained. Even in the best laboratory operations, however, the potential for specimen mix-up, cross contamination, floaters, or carry-over artifacts cannot be eliminated completely. The work-up and analysis of these cases can be challenging to the pathologist for a number of reasons, including the fact that there is no standardized approach. This review discusses a standardized approach that includes clinical correlation, laboratory correlation, and laboratory analysis, potentially including a molecular DNA fingerprinting analysis. The methods and techniques behind DNA fingerprinting for tissue and sample identity are also discussed in detail.
Insights
Maintaining patient identity in pathology labs is crucial. This review proposes a standardized approach, including DNA fingerprinting, to address specimen mix-ups and ensure accurate diagnostic pathology.
Area of Science:
- Pathology
- Laboratory Medicine
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Patient identity is paramount in diagnostic pathology, highlighted by Joint Commission Laboratory Goals.
- Despite quality assurance, specimen mix-ups and contamination remain potential risks.
- Lack of a standardized approach complicates the analysis of compromised samples.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present a standardized workflow for managing potential specimen identity issues in pathology.
- To detail methods for ensuring accurate sample identification throughout laboratory processing.
- To explore the utility of DNA fingerprinting in confirming tissue and sample identity.
Main Methods:
- Review of current quality assurance practices in pathology laboratories.
- Proposal of a multi-step standardized approach: clinical correlation, laboratory correlation, and laboratory analysis.
- Detailed discussion of DNA fingerprinting techniques for molecular sample identification.
Main Results:
- A standardized approach can mitigate challenges arising from specimen mix-ups.
- DNA fingerprinting offers a robust method for verifying tissue and sample identity.
- Implementing this standardized workflow enhances diagnostic accuracy and patient safety.
Conclusions:
- A standardized approach integrating clinical, laboratory, and molecular data is essential for reliable pathology diagnostics.
- DNA fingerprinting serves as a critical tool for resolving identity discrepancies.
- Adoption of these strategies improves patient safety and laboratory integrity.
Related Concept Videos
Rapid Identification of Pathogens
Overview Of Cell Separation And Isolation