Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection01:26

Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection

The hosts' susceptibility to infection depends on several factors. The integrity of the skin and mucous membranes helps protect the body against microbial attacks. When the skin is altered, the chance of infection, limb loss, and even death increases.
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin create...
Barriers to Effective Communication II01:21

Barriers to Effective Communication II

The barriers to effective communication also include cultural barriers, semantic barriers, gender barriers, and time constraints.
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Barriers to Effective Communication I01:30

Barriers to Effective Communication I

A communication barrier is any distortion or interruption during a conversation, resulting in miscommunication of the message. A good communicator should know these barriers and continuously check for the listener's understanding by obtaining feedback.
Communication barriers include the following:
Physiological barriers: They are limitations caused by a person's health condition or disability, such as hearing loss, poor eyesight, illness, or unconsciousness. An example to overcome this barrier...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
Types of Reports II: Incident or Occurrence Report01:21

Types of Reports II: Incident or Occurrence Report

An Incident or Occurrence Report in a healthcare setting is a crucial document used to record any unexpected occurrence that may or may not have affected a patient, employee, or visitor. Such reports are critical to improving patient safety and include all details leading up to and including the event.
Purposes:
In the healthcare industry, reports play a crucial role in documenting incidents within an agency. The primary objective of these reports is to ensure patient safety, uphold the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Overcoming the knowledge-behavior gap: The effect of evidence-based HPV vaccination leaflets on understanding, intention, and actual vaccination decision.

Vaccine·2014
Same author

[Do media reports and public brochures facilitate informed decision making about cervical cancer prevention?].

Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz·2011
Same author

Visions of rationality.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2011
Same author

[Competence in dealing with uncertainty: lessons to learn from the influenza pandemic (H1N1) 2009].

Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz·2010
Same author

[Is one picture worth a thousand words? Risk communication in primary care: advantages and shortcomings of different methods].

Praxis·2008
Same author

The adaptive toolbox: toward a darwinian rationality.

Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation·2002

Related Experiment Videos

[About the risk to communicate risk].

O Wegwarth1, G Gigerenzer

  • 1Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung, Berlin. wegwarth@mpib-berlin.mpg.de

Therapeutische Umschau. Revue Therapeutique
|June 28, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Understanding medical risk and probabilities is crucial for doctors. This article explains how presenting risk information clearly helps clinicians and patients make informed decisions.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Medical Statistics
  • Risk Communication
  • Clinical Decision-Making

Background:

  • Effective risk communication is vital in medicine.
  • Doctors frequently assess disease likelihood based on test results.
  • Informed patient decisions depend on clear risk understanding.

Observation:

  • Clinicians often struggle with accurate risk judgment.
  • There's a tendency for healthcare professionals to overestimate risk.
  • The way risks are presented significantly impacts interpretation.

Findings:

  • Statistical thinking and probability are foundational to risk assessment.
  • Misinterpretation of risk data can lead to poor clinical decisions.
  • Clearer presentation of risk information can improve accuracy.

Implications:

  • Improved risk communication enhances patient comprehension and informed consent.
  • Addressing presentation pitfalls can aid clinicians in providing accurate risk assessments.
  • Better understanding of medical probabilities supports evidence-based practice.