Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Analyzing and Building Nucleic Acid Structures with 3DNA
Published on: April 26, 2013
Influence of DNA structure on adjacent site cooperative binding
Maryam Rahimian1, Yi Miao, W David Wilson
1Department of Chemistry, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 4098, Atlanta, Georgia 30303, USA.
Abstract:
Previous NMR studies of Hoechst 33258 with the d(CTTTTGCAAAAG)2 sequence have shown very strong (K2 >> K1) cooperativity between two adjacent binding sites (Searle, M. S.; Embrey, K. J. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990, 18 (13), 3753- 3762). In contrast, surface plasmon resonance (SPR) results with the hairpin analog of the same sequence show significantly reduced cooperativity. In an effort to explain the difference, two-dimensional (2-D) NMR experiments were done on both duplex and hairpin. Hoechst 33258 and an amidine analog, DB183, show very strong cooperativity with the duplex DNA but much weaker cooperativity with the hairpin. The significantly lower thermal melting temperature (Tm) of the duplex (34.8 degrees C) in comparison to its hairpin analog (62.3 degrees C) supports the idea of a dynamic difference between the two DNA structures that can influence cooperativity in binding. These results confirm the role of conformational entropy in positive cooperativity in some DNA interactions.
Related Concept Videos
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
Single-Strand DNA Binding Proteins
Nucleic Acid Structure
DNA Structure
DNA has a double-helix structure. The...

