Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Learning Modern Laryngeal Surgery in a Dissection Laboratory
Published on: March 18, 2020
Clinical course following endoscopic repair of type 1 laryngeal clefts
Amy S Ketcham1, Jacob E Smith, Fu-Shing Lee
1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Avenue, Charleston, SC 29425, United States.
Objectives:
Treatment of type I laryngeal clefts (T1LCs) remains controversial. We present our experience with 16 endoscopic T1LC repairs to evaluate the effect of patient characteristics and surgical technique on outcomes.
Methods:
A retrospective study was performed. Diagnosis of T1LC was made by interarytenoid palpation during operative microlaryngoscopy. Two surgeons performed endoscopic repair using either microflap reconstruction or laser demucosalization and reapproximation. All patients received preoperative and postoperative modified barium swallow (MBS) studies. Improved MBS at 3-5 months determined success of repair. Factors contributing to success of repair were analyzed statistically.
Results:
No intraoperative complications occurred. One T1LC repair dehisced after 3 months. Overall, 11 of 16 repairs (68.8%) were successful. Mean age at repair was 23.3 months. Length of stay for microflap repair was significantly shorter than for laser reapproximation (0.89 days vs. 4.6 days, p<0.001, two-tail t-test). The difference in patient age between failures and successes (21.3 months vs. 24.2 months) was non-significant (p=0.661, two-tail t-test). Success for the nine patients receiving microflap reconstruction (77.8%) vs. the seven receiving laser reapproximation (57.1%) is comparable (p=0.596, Fisher's exact test). No correlation between comorbidities and failure was found (p>0.05, Fisher's exact test).
Conclusions:
This series matches the largest reported series of endoscopic T1LC repairs. Success rates were lower than in previously reported studies, and comorbidities were higher. However, comorbidities did not contribute to surgical failure. No difference in outcome was seen between the two endoscopic techniques. Microflap repair may require a shorter hospital stay.
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Larynx
Anatomy of the Larynx
The larynx consists of various components, including cartilage, muscles, and vocal cords. Its structure includes three large unpaired cartilages—the thyroid, cricoid, and epiglottis—and three smaller paired cartilages—the arytenoids, corniculates, and...
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure entails...
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus.
