Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Intellectual Disability01:29

Intellectual Disability

Intellectual disability (ID) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by deficits in intellectual and adaptive functioning that manifest during the developmental period. This condition encompasses challenges in reasoning, memory, problem-solving, and learning, accompanied by impairments in everyday life skills, such as communication, self-care, and social interactions. Intellectual disability affects approximately 1% of the population in the United States, impacting an estimated 5...
z Scores and Area Under the Curve01:17

z Scores and Area Under the Curve

z scores are the standardized values obtained after converting a normal distribution into a standard normal distribution. A z score is measured in units of the standard deviation. The z score tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a z score of zero.
z Scores and Unusual Values01:07

z Scores and Unusual Values

The z score is one of the three measures of relative standing. It describes the location of a value in a dataset relative to the mean. z scores are obtained after the standardization of the values in a dataset. The z score for the mean is 0.
 This score indicates how far a value is from the mean in terms of standard deviation. For example, if a data value has a z score of +1, the researcher can infer that the particular data value is one standard deviation above the mean. If another data value...
Introduction to z Scores01:05

Introduction to z Scores

A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It indicates how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores help...
Introduction to z Scores01:06

Introduction to z Scores

A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores help...
The Anderson-Darling Test01:16

The Anderson-Darling Test

The Anderson-Darling test is a statistical method used to determine whether a data sample is likely drawn from a specific theoretical distribution. Unlike parametric tests, it does not require assumptions about specific parameters of the distribution. Instead, it compares the sample's empirical cumulative distribution function (ECDF) with the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the hypothesized distribution. Critical values for the test are specific to the chosen distribution rather than...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Characterization of ICAM-1 biophore to design cytoadherence blocking peptides.

Journal of molecular graphics & modelling·2015
Same author

Cryopreservation of quince (Cydonia oblonga Mill.).

Cryo letters·2014
Same author

Lead contamination of surgical gloves by contact with a lead hand.

ISRN orthopedics·2014
Same author

Infrapatellar fat pad: an aid in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2014
Same author

Bioavailability of iodine in the UK-Peak District environment and its human bioaccessibility: an assessment of the causes of historical goitre in this area.

Environmental monitoring and assessment·2014
Same author

A preliminary investigation of pollution in the River Yamuna, Delhi, India: Metal concentrations in river bank soils and plants.

Environmental geochemistry and health·2013

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 4, 2026

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test (MSPT): An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
11:35

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test (MSPT): An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

Published on: June 30, 2014

Oswestry Disability Index scoring made easy.

A Mehra1, D Baker, S Disney

  • 1Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Northfield, Birmingham, UK. amehra@talk21.com

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England
|July 5, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Training staff on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) significantly improved scoring accuracy for low back pain assessments. This initiative reduced errors from 33% to 14%, enhancing patient outcome measurement reliability.

More Related Videos

Evaluation of Patients' Posture and Gait Profile After Lumbar Fusion Surgery by Video Rasterstereography and Treadmill Gait Analysis
07:44

Evaluation of Patients' Posture and Gait Profile After Lumbar Fusion Surgery by Video Rasterstereography and Treadmill Gait Analysis

Published on: March 23, 2019

SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients
11:05

SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients

Published on: February 6, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2026

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test (MSPT): An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
11:35

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test (MSPT): An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

Published on: June 30, 2014

Evaluation of Patients' Posture and Gait Profile After Lumbar Fusion Surgery by Video Rasterstereography and Treadmill Gait Analysis
07:44

Evaluation of Patients' Posture and Gait Profile After Lumbar Fusion Surgery by Video Rasterstereography and Treadmill Gait Analysis

Published on: March 23, 2019

SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients
11:05

SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients

Published on: February 6, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Research
  • Health Outcomes Measurement

Background:

  • Low back pain affects up to 80% of the population.
  • The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a key tool for measuring low back pain disability.
  • Accurate scoring of the ODI is crucial for reliable patient outcome assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of staff training on the accuracy of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scoring.
  • To determine if improved understanding of ODI scoring protocols reduces errors in clinical practice.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 100 completed Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) forms to identify scoring errors.
  • Implementation of staff training sessions focused on correct ODI scoring procedures.
  • Development of a scoring chart to assist staff.
  • Prospective audit of 50 ODI forms after training to assess error reduction.

Main Results:

  • Initial retrospective review found 33% of ODI forms were scored incorrectly.
  • Errors were particularly prevalent in forms with incomplete patient sections.
  • Post-training prospective audit showed a significant reduction in scoring errors to 14%.

Conclusions:

  • Inadequate understanding and training in scoring systems like the ODI can lead to significant errors.
  • Implementing standardized training and providing scoring aids (e.g., charts) are essential for improving the accuracy of outcome measures.
  • Clinicians must stay updated on scoring methodologies for reliable patient assessment.