Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
Serial Position Effect01:03

Serial Position Effect

The serial position effect is a cognitive phenomenon where individuals are more likely to recall the first and last items in a list compared to those in the middle. This effect is divided into the primacy effect and the recency effect. The primacy effect is observed when the initial items in a list are remembered better. This occurs because these items are rehearsed more frequently or receive more elaborative processing, allowing them to be encoded into long-term memory more effectively. For...
Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Age effects on the extraction and integration of parafoveal information in reading.

Psychology and aging·2026
Same author

Real-time processing of misinformation and its correction: Insights from eye movements during reading.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2026
Same author

Letter identity and position coding in the parafovea.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2024
Same author

Prediction in reading: A review of predictability effects, their theoretical implications, and beyond.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2024
Same author

Towards a model of eye-movement control in Chinese reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2024
Same author

Direct lexical control of eye movements in Chinese reading: Evidence from the co-registration of EEG and eye tracking.

Cognitive psychology·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Serial or parallel? Using depth-of-processing to examine attention allocation during reading.

Erik D Reichle1, Polina M Vanyukov, Patryk A Laurent

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, 635 LRDC, 3939 O'Hara St., Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA. reichle@pitt.edu

Vision Research
|July 8, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Attention allocation differs based on task demands. Simple visual tasks show minimal impact from multiple words, while complex lexical processing tasks demonstrate serial attention, affecting response times and eye movements.

More Related Videos

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks
08:32

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks

Published on: September 5, 2019

An Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Ageing on Sentence Processing
04:30

An Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Ageing on Sentence Processing

Published on: October 25, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks
08:32

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks

Published on: September 5, 2019

An Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Ageing on Sentence Processing
04:30

An Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Ageing on Sentence Processing

Published on: October 25, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Human Attention Studies

Background:

  • Understanding how humans allocate attention is crucial for cognitive models.
  • Previous research suggests attention may operate serially, especially during reading.
  • The role of lexical processing in attention allocation requires further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate attention allocation during tasks with varying lexical processing demands.
  • To determine if attention operates serially or in parallel for different types of word-related tasks.
  • To examine the impact of the number of simultaneously presented words on task performance.

Main Methods:

  • An experiment was conducted using four tasks with increasing lexical processing requirements.
  • Tasks included asterisk detection, letter detection, rhyme judgment, and semantic judgment.
  • Response times and eye movements were recorded as participants processed 1-4 words.

Main Results:

  • Asterisk-detection (low lexical load) showed minimal effects of word number on performance.
  • Letter-detection, rhyme-judgment, and semantic-judgment tasks (higher lexical load) showed significant increases in response times and eye movement changes with more words.
  • Results suggest attention is not strictly serial for visual feature tasks but becomes approximately serial for lexical tasks.

Conclusions:

  • Attention allocation is influenced by the degree of lexical processing required by a task.
  • Findings support models where attention becomes more serial as task complexity increases, particularly for word meaning retrieval.
  • The study provides insights into the mechanisms underlying readers' eye movements and attention during language processing.