Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Understanding Deception

Understanding Deception

Deception is a pervasive aspect of human communication. Empirical studies have shown that most individuals engage in some form of deceit on a daily basis, with approximately 20% of social exchanges involving deceptive elements. Lying follows a developmental trajectory, peaking during adolescence and declining with age, possibly due to the maturation of cognitive control and social accountability.Cognitive and Social Factors in Deception DetectionDespite its prevalence, accurately detecting...

Fundamental Attribution Error

Fundamental Attribution Error

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...

First Impression

First Impression

First impressions play a crucial role in social perception, shaping how individuals assess others in professional, academic, and interpersonal contexts. Psychological research highlights the significance of cognitive biases, such as the primacy and recency effects, which influence how people interpret and recall information.The Primacy Effect and Cognitive AnchoringThe primacy effect describes the tendency for initial information to impact judgment disproportionately. When individuals encounter...

Confirmation Biases

Confirmation Biases

The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?

Dark Triad and Person Perception

Dark Triad and Person Perception

Person perception is influenced by both external behaviors and the observer’s internal characteristics, including personality traits. Individuals with dark personality traits, comprising psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and narcissism — collectively known as the dark triad – exhibit manipulative and exploitative tendencies in social contexts. These traits affect how they perceive others and how they are perceived.The Role of Dark Personality Traits in Person PerceptionBlack et al. (2014) explored...

Self-Serving Bias

Self-Serving Bias

Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Predicting social relations model effects from conditional expectations.

Psychological methods·2022

Same author

A Longitudinal Study of the Development of Emotional Deception Detection Within New Same-Sex Friendships.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2015

Same author

Direct and indirect measures of lie detection tell the same story: a reply to ten Brinke, Stimson, and Carney (2014).

Psychological science·2014

Same author

Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments.

Psychological bulletin·2011

Same author

Embodiment, agency, and attitude change.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2009

Same author

On lie detection "wizards".

Law and human behavior·2007

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 3, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

Individual differences in judging deception: accuracy and bias.

Charles F Bond¹, Bella M Depaulo

¹Department of Psychology, Texas Christian University, TX, USA. cbond53@yahoo.com

Psychological Bulletin

|July 9, 2008

Summary

Individual differences in lie detection ability are minimal, even when judging strangers in real-time. A person's inherent credibility, rather than lie-detection skill, significantly influences deception judgments.

More Related Videos

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 3, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

Area of Science:

Psychology
Social Psychology
Behavioral Science

Background:

Previous research suggests significant individual differences in the ability to detect deception.
However, the extent and nature of these differences require rigorous examination, especially under realistic conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

To conduct a meta-analysis of individual differences in real-time deception detection among strangers.
To statistically correct for measurement error and accurately assess the magnitude of ability differences in lie detection.

Main Methods:

A meta-analysis of 247 independent samples was performed.
A novel statistical technique was employed to correct for random measurement error in assessing judge abilities.
Focus was on real-time deception judgments without special aids.

Main Results:

Psychometric analyses revealed that individual differences in lie detection ability are minute, with corrected standard deviations less than 1% in lie detection accuracy.
Judge accuracy varied no more than expected by chance; the best judges performed no better than random chance.
Differences in the inclination to trust others (truth-bias) were more pronounced than differences in detection ability.
Individual differences were also observed in people's credibility as both truth-tellers and liars, and in the detectability of their lies.

Conclusions:

The ability to detect deception shows minimal individual variation, contrary to some prior suggestions.
A person's inherent credibility is a more significant factor in deception judgments than their skill in detecting lies.
Future research should consider the role of sender credibility and receiver biases in deception detection outcomes.