Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats
Published on: February 4, 2016
Partial reinforcement and context switch effects in human predictive learning
María J F Abad1, Manuel M Ramos-Alvarez, Juan M Rosas
1Departamento de Psicología, University of Jaén, Paraje de las Lagunillas s/n, Jaén, Spain.
Contextual changes impact learning and memory. Specifically, shifting environments altered judgments for continuously reinforced cues but not for partially reinforced ones, suggesting reinforcement schedules influence context-dependent effects.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Learning and Memory
- Behavioral Science
Background:
- Context plays a crucial role in associative learning and memory retrieval.
- Context-specific effects, where learning is influenced by the environment, are well-documented.
- Understanding how different reinforcement schedules interact with contextual changes is key to explaining learning phenomena.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of context changes on contingency judgments under different reinforcement schedules.
- To examine whether partial reinforcement or continuous reinforcement affects the salience of contextual cues.
- To test the hypothesis that cue ambiguity, modulated by reinforcement, drives context switch effects.
Main Methods:
- Human participants completed a trial-by-trial contingency judgment task predicting an outcome (diarrhea) from cues (food names) in specific contexts (restaurants).
- Cues were trained with either partial reinforcement (50% outcome) or continuous reinforcement (100% outcome) in Context A.
- Testing occurred in both the original training context (A) and a novel context (B), with judgments compared across conditions.
Main Results:
- Context change significantly decreased judgments for continuously reinforced cues but did not affect judgments for partially reinforced cues (Experiment 1).
- This context switch effect was contingent on the reinforcement history of other cues within the training context (Experiment 2).
- The effect diminished when both cues received partial reinforcement across contexts during training (Experiment 3).
Conclusions:
- The findings suggest that the degree of reinforcement ambiguity influences the extent to which context affects cue-outcome associations.
- Partially reinforced cues, potentially more ambiguous, appear less susceptible to context switch effects.
- Results support theories positing that cue ambiguity enhances attention to context, thereby modulating associative strength.
Related Concept Videos
Associative Learning
Classical conditioning, also known...
Real-World Application of Classical Conditioning
Higher-order, or second-order, conditioning occurs when a neutral stimulus becomes associated with an already established conditioned stimulus through repeated pairings. For instance, if a dog has been...
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Purposive Learning
Cognitive Learning
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
Generalization, Discrimination, and Extinction
Generalization occurs when a behavior reinforced in one context is performed in similar situations. For instance, a student who studies diligently for calculus and receives excellent grades might apply the same study habits to psychology and history, expecting similar results. Generalization shows how learning in one setting can influence behavior in...