Related Experiment Videos
The area under the ROC curve and its competitors
1Institute of Medical Genetics (Biostatistics), University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Summary
The area under the ROC curve is an inconsistent measure for diagnostic test accuracy. New diagnosticity measures (DMs) offer a consistent alternative, calculable from ROC curves for better medical decision-making.
Area of Science:
- Medical Decision Making
- Biostatistics
- Diagnostic Test Evaluation
Background:
- The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is widely used to assess diagnostic test performance.
- However, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) can be an inconsistent metric, as tests with similar clinical impact may yield different AUC values.
Purpose of the Study:
- To address the inconsistency of the area under the ROC curve (AUC) as a diagnostic test evaluation criterion.
- To propose a new class of diagnosticity measures (DMs) that are consistent and optimal.
- To demonstrate the utility of these DMs in medical decision-making contexts.
Main Methods:
- Introduced a class of diagnosticity measures (DMs) based on regret theory.
- Developed methods to calculate DMs from the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve configuration.
- Defined two scaled variants of the ROC curve to aid in the analysis.
Main Results:
- Demonstrated that the area under the ROC curve (AUC) is an inconsistent measure of diagnostic test power.
- Proposed a class of diagnosticity measures (DMs) that are uniquely defined and optimally chosen once a regret measure is specified.
- Showed that these DMs are calculable from the ROC curve, offering a consistent alternative.
Conclusions:
- The proposed diagnosticity measures (DMs) provide a more consistent and theoretically sound approach to evaluating diagnostic tests compared to the area under the ROC curve (AUC).
- These DMs are adaptable based on the chosen measure of diagnostic uncertainty, offering flexibility in application.
- The methods and scaled ROC variants introduced can benefit students and researchers in medical decision making and diagnostic test evaluation.