Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Negative effects of redundant targets.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026

Same author

Spatial selectivity in visual detection suffers when attention is divided.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025

Same author

Quantifying the strength of firearms comparisons based on error rate studies.

Journal of forensic sciences·2024

Same author

Feasibility of forecasting future critical care bed availability using bed management data.

BMJ health & care informatics·2024

Same author

A Ruthenium(II) Polypyridyl Complex Disrupts Actin Cytoskeleton Assembly and Blocks Cytokinesis.

Angewandte Chemie (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2024

Same author

Testing hemifield independence for divided attention in visual object tasks.

Journal of vision·2023

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 3, 2026

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Set-size effects for identification versus localization depend on the visual search task.

Tom Busey¹, John Palmer

¹Department of Psychology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA. busey@indiana.edu

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance

|July 31, 2008

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study investigated whether identity and location processing are linked. Findings show their processing is similar, refuting theories of privileged identity or location information processing.

More Related Videos

Spotlighting Customers' Visual Attention at the Stock, Shelf and Store Levels with the 3S Model

Spotlighting Customers' Visual Attention at the Stock, Shelf and Store Levels with the 3S Model

Published on: May 24, 2019

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 3, 2026

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Spotlighting Customers' Visual Attention at the Stock, Shelf and Store Levels with the 3S Model

Spotlighting Customers' Visual Attention at the Stock, Shelf and Store Levels with the 3S Model

Published on: May 24, 2019

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

Area of Science:

Cognitive Neuroscience
Visual Perception

Background:

The relationship between identity and location processing in the brain is a key debate in cognitive neuroscience.
It remains unclear if identity or location processing has a privileged capacity.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the hypothesis of privileged processing for identity or location.
To analyze set-size effects in visual search tasks involving identification and localization.

Main Methods:

Measured set-size effects in accuracy for visual search tasks with one or two possible targets.
Compared set-size effects for identification versus localization tasks.

Main Results:

A crossover interaction was observed: set-size effects were smaller for identification than localization in 1-target tasks, but larger in 2-target tasks.
This interaction pattern contradicts the privileged processing hypothesis for either identity or location.

Conclusions:

The results support an independent channel model, suggesting similar processing for identity and location.
The privileged processing hypothesis for identity or location is refuted by the observed data.