Related Experiment Videos
Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: randomised controlled trial
Philip M Davis1, Bruce V Lewenstein, Daniel H Simon
1Department of Communication, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. pmd8@cornell.edu
Objective:
To measure the effect of free access to the scientific literature on article downloads and citations.
Design:
Randomised controlled trial.
Setting:
11 journals published by the American Physiological Society.
Participants:
1619 research articles and reviews.
Main Outcome Measures:
Article readership (measured as downloads of full text, PDFs, and abstracts) and number of unique visitors (internet protocol addresses). Citations to articles were gathered from the Institute for Scientific Information after one year.
Interventions:
Random assignment on online publication of articles published in 11 scientific journals to open access (treatment) or subscription access (control).
Results:
Articles assigned to open access were associated with 89% more full text downloads (95% confidence interval 76% to 103%), 42% more PDF downloads (32% to 52%), and 23% more unique visitors (16% to 30%), but 24% fewer abstract downloads (-29% to -19%) than subscription access articles in the first six months after publication. Open access articles were no more likely to be cited than subscription access articles in the first year after publication. Fifty nine per cent of open access articles (146 of 247) were cited nine to 12 months after publication compared with 63% (859 of 1372) of subscription access articles. Logistic and negative binomial regression analysis of article citation counts confirmed no citation advantage for open access articles.
Conclusions:
Open access publishing may reach more readers than subscription access publishing. No evidence was found of a citation advantage for open access articles in the first year after publication. The citation advantage from open access reported widely in the literature may be an artefact of other causes.
Related Concept Videos
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Chi-square Analysis
The chi-square test was developed by Pearson in 1990.
The first step of performing a Chi-square analysis is to establish a null hypothesis, which assumes that there is no real...
Study Design in Statistics
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...