Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2026
Expansion Duroplasty For Severe Cervical Spinal Cord Swelling After Traumatic Injury: A Step-by-Step Surgical Protocol
Published on: May 26, 2026
Efficacy and safety of a collagen matrix for cranial and spinal dural reconstruction using different fixation
Ruediger Stendel1, Marco Danne, Ingo Fiss
1Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany. ruediger.stendel@charite.de
Object:
The use of dural grafts is frequently unavoidable when tension-free dural closure cannot be achieved following neurosurgical procedures or trauma. Biodegradable collagen matrices serve as a scaffold for the regrowth of natural tissue and require no suturing. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of dural repair with a collagen matrix using different fixation techniques.
Methods:
A total of 221 patients (98 male and 123 female; mean age 55.6 +/- 17.8 years) undergoing cranial (86.4%) or spinal (13.6%) procedures with the use of a collagen matrix dural graft were included in this retrospective study. The indications for use, fixation techniques, and associated complications were recorded.
Results:
There were no complications of the dural graft in spinal use. Five (2.6%) of 191 patients undergoing cranial procedures developed infections, 3 of which (1.6%) were deep infections requiring surgical revision. There was no statistically significant relationship between the operative field status before surgery and the occurrence of a postoperative wound infection (p = 0.684). In the 191 patients undergoing a cranial procedure, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collection occurred in 5 patients (2.6%) and a CSF fistula in 5 (2.6%), 3 of whom (1.6%) required surgical revision. No patient who underwent an operation with preexisting CSF leakage had postoperative CSF leakage. Postoperative infection significantly increased the risk for postoperative CSF leakage. The collagen matrix was used without additional fixation in 124 patients (56.1%), with single fixation in 55 (24.9%), and with multiple fixations in 42 (19%). There were no systemic allergic reactions or local skin changes. Follow-up imaging in 112 patients (50.7%) revealed no evidence of any adverse reaction to the collagen graft.
Conclusions:
The collagen matrix is an effective and safe cranial and spinal dural substitute that can be used even in cases of an existing local infection. Postoperative deep infection increases the risk for CSF leakage.
