Sirolimus therapy in liver transplant patients: an initial experience at a single center

A Nocera1, E Andorno, A Tagliamacco

  • 1Transplant Immunology Unit, San Martino Hospital, Genoa, Italy. arcangelo.nocera@hsanmartino.it

Insights

Sirolimus (SRL) shows promise as an effective monotherapy for liver transplant patients, with potential anticancer effects. Further large-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Area of Science:

  • Transplantation Immunology
  • Oncology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Sirolimus (SRL), an mTOR inhibitor, has demonstrated anticancer properties in preclinical models, contrasting with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs).
  • Liver transplant recipients, particularly those with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or at risk for post-transplant cancers, are candidates for novel immunosuppressive strategies.
  • The study investigates the use of SRL as an alternative to CNIs in specific liver transplant patient cohorts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Sirolimus (SRL) as a primary immunosuppressant in liver transplant patients.
  • To assess the potential anticancer effects of SRL in patients with a history of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or those developing de novo post-transplant cancers.
  • To determine the feasibility of SRL monotherapy in liver transplant recipients.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of liver transplant patients receiving Sirolimus (SRL) from February 2005 onwards.
  • Patients were divided into two groups: Group A (HCC patients) and Group B (HCC-negative patients with de novo cancers).
  • SRL was initiated at 2 mg/d, adjusted to target blood levels of 6-8 ng/mL, with gradual tapering and discontinuation of CNIs.

Main Results:

  • 19.0% (4/21) of patients discontinued SRL due to side effects (thrombocytopenia, headache, leukopenia, edema, arthralgia).
  • 14 patients (11 in Group A, 3 in Group B) remained on SRL monotherapy.
  • One HCC recurrence and one de novo pancreatic adenocarcinoma were observed in patients exceeding Milan criteria; one patient died from pneumonitis potentially related to SRL.

Conclusions:

  • Sirolimus (SRL) appears to be an effective immunosuppressant for liver transplant patients, suitable for monotherapy.
  • The potential anticancer effects of SRL require validation through large, randomized clinical trials with extended follow-up.
  • Careful monitoring for side effects is crucial when initiating SRL therapy in liver transplant recipients.