Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A reliability and validity study of the Palliative Performance Scale.

Francis Ho1, Francis Lau, Michael G Downing

  • 1School of Health Information Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. fho@uvic.ca

BMC Palliative Care
|August 6, 2008
PubMed
Summary

The Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) is a reliable and valid tool for assessing patient performance in palliative care. This study confirms its consistency and usefulness in clinical practice.

Related Concept Videos

Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
Pulmonary Function Tests01:25

Pulmonary Function Tests

Pulmonary Function Tests (PFTs)
Pulmonary Function Tests are crucial diagnostic tools for assessing respiratory function, particularly in patients with chronic respiratory disorders. They comprehensively evaluate lung volumes, ventilatory function, breathing mechanics, diffusion, and gas exchange. These tests help diagnose pulmonary diseases and play a significant role in monitoring disease progression, evaluating disability, and assessing response to therapy.
PFTs involve using a spirometer, a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Current state of electronic problems lists in primary care: a rapid scoping review.

Family practice·2026
Same author

Effect of Limosilactobacillus reuteri Probiotic on Oral Mucositis in Patients Undergoing Head and Neck Radiation: A Randomised Trial.

Oral diseases·2025
Same author

Impact of geriatric assessment and Geriatric 8-based targeted interventions on quality of life in older adults with cancer.

Journal of geriatric oncology·2024
Same author

Using journey maps to understand patientreported outcome measures in the cancer journey.

Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique·2024
Same author

Durvalumab Following Chemoradiotherapy for Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Differences in Survival Based on Age and Post-Progression Systemic Therapy.

Targeted oncology·2024
Same author

Health-related quality of life with comprehensive geriatric assessment guided care versus usual care in older adults with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Critical reviews in oncology/hematology·2024

Area of Science:

  • Palliative Care Medicine
  • Clinical Assessment Tools
  • Healthcare Performance Measurement

Background:

  • The Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) was introduced in 1996 for performance status measurement in palliative care.
  • It has gained international use and been translated into multiple languages.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Palliative Performance Scale (PPS).
  • To assess the consistency and accuracy of PPS in clinical settings.

Main Methods:

  • A web-based, test-retest reliability study using case scenarios with 53 participants.
  • A content validation study involving 15 palliative care experts via telephone interviews.
  • Exploration of PPS as a clinical tool, its utility, impact on decision-making, and instructional adequacy.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • High intraclass correlation coefficients (0.931-0.964) and strong Cohen's kappa (0.67-0.71) indicated excellent inter-rater and test-retest reliability.
  • Palliative care experts affirmed PPS as a valuable clinical assessment tool, with many integrating it into standard practice.

Conclusions:

  • The Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) is a reliable and valid instrument for palliative care.
  • Experts found PPS useful for prognostication, monitoring, care planning, resource allocation, teaching, and research.
  • Minor suggestions for clearer definitions were noted, but overall, PPS requires minimal modification.