Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Describing and comparing protein structures using shape strings.

Nanjiang Shu1, Sven Hovmöller, Tuping Zhou

  • 1Structural Chemistry, Arrhenius Laboratory, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.

Current Protein & Peptide Science
|August 12, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The evolutionary history of topological variations in the CPA/AT transporters.

PLoS computational biology·2021
Same author

Twinning and intertwined microcrystals in an intriguing, yet elusive, mineral.

IUCrJ·2020
Same author

3D Electron Diffraction: The Nanocrystallography Revolution.

ACS central science·2019
Same author

A Rare Lysozyme Crystal Form Solved Using Highly Redundant Multiple Electron Diffraction Datasets from Micron-Sized Crystals.

Structure (London, England : 1993)·2018
Same author

Improved protein model quality assessments by changing the target function.

Proteins·2018
Same author

Topology of membrane proteins-predictions, limitations and variations.

Current opinion in structural biology·2017
Same journal

Therapeutic Peptides as Targeting Vectors and Smart Therapeutics: Emerging Trends and Future Perspectives.

Current protein & peptide science·2026
Same journal

Innovative Protein Nanostructures and Hybrid Systems for Enhanced Encapsulation and Controlled Delivery of Bioactive Agents.

Current protein & peptide science·2026
Same journal

Nanotherapeutic Interventions in Diabetic Wound Healing: Biomarker- Guided Mechanisms and Translational Prospects.

Current protein & peptide science·2026
Same journal

Recent developments in intein-mediated protein splicing and their applications in bioengineering.

Current protein & peptide science·2026
Same journal

Amyloids of Food Proteins: Balancing Benefits and Risks.

Current protein & peptide science·2026
Same journal

Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitors in Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Path to Cognitive Rescue.

Current protein & peptide science·2026
See all related articles

Comparing protein structures is crucial for understanding function and improving predictions. New 1D string methods offer compact, informative representations for efficient database searching and similarity assessments.

Area of Science:

  • Structural bioinformatics
  • Computational biology
  • Protein science

Background:

  • X-ray crystallography has determined tens of thousands of protein structures.
  • Comparing protein structures is vital for understanding function, predicting structures, and evaluating prediction methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review methods for describing and comparing protein structures.
  • To highlight a novel 1D geometrical string representation for protein structures.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing protein structure comparison techniques.
  • Development and application of 1D geometrical strings based on Ramachandran plot analysis of dihedral angles.
  • Utilizing shape symbols for clustered backbone regions.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • 1D geometrical strings are as compact as secondary structure descriptions.
  • These strings provide richer information, especially in protein loop regions.
  • The method enables rapid searching of structural databases for similar proteins.

Conclusions:

  • 1D geometrical strings offer an efficient and informative way to represent and compare protein structures.
  • This approach facilitates the comparison of predicted versus native protein structures.
  • The method enhances database searching and structural similarity analysis.