Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

08:25
Evaluating the Function of the Foot Core System in the Elderly
Published on: March 11, 2022
Assessment of subtalar joint neutral position: a cadaveric study
Yan-xi Chen1, Guang-rong Yu, Jiong Mei
1Department of Orthopaedics, Tongji Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, China. cyxtongji@yahoo.com.cn
Chinese Medical Journal
|August 15, 2008
Summary
The subtalar joint's neutral position is crucial for orthotics but difficult to measure. This study found the optimal neutral position is 10° abduction, 20° dorsiflexion, and 10° eversion, challenging traditional methods.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Orthopedics
- Anatomy
Background:
- The subtalar joint (STJ) neutral position is critical for fabricating custom orthotics.
- Current methods for determining STJ neutral position lack proven accuracy and reproducibility.
- This study aimed to define the STJ neutral position in cadaveric feet.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate and define the subtalar joint (STJ) neutral position in normal feet using cadavers.
- To challenge the traditional clinical understanding of STJ neutral position.
- To provide a more accurate reference for orthotic fabrication.
Main Methods:
- Utilized twelve fresh-frozen human lower leg specimens.
- Inserted pressure-sensitive films into the anterior and posterior STJ articulations.
- Determined contact areas under axial load (600 N) and various foot positions using digitized film analysis.
Main Results:
- The maximum STJ contact area in the traditional neutral position was 2.79 cm².
- Maximum contact areas were achieved at 10° abduction (3.00 cm²), 20° dorsiflexion (3.61 cm²), and 10° eversion (3.14 cm²).
- These positions significantly differed from the traditional neutral ankle-foot position (P < 0.05).
Conclusions:
- The subtalar joint (STJ) neutral position does not align with the traditional clinical ankle-foot neutral position.
- The most accurate STJ neutral position was determined to be 10° abduction, 20° dorsiflexion, and 10° eversion.
- These findings necessitate a re-evaluation of current methods for STJ assessment in orthotic practice.

