Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
Race/ethnicity and breast cancer estrogen receptor status: impact of class, missing data, and modeling assumptions
Nancy Krieger1, Jarvis T Chen, James H Ware
1Department of Society, Human Development and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA. nkrieger@hsph.harvard.edu
Objective:
To test whether reported associations between race/ethnicity and breast cancer estrogen receptor (ER) status are inflated due to missing ER data, lack of socioeconomic data, and use of the odds ratio (OR) rather than the prevalence ratio (PR).
Methods:
We geocoded and added census tract socioeconomic data to all cases of primary invasive breast cancer (n = 42,420) among women diagnosed between 1998 and 2002 in two California cancer registries (San Francisco Bay Area; Los Angeles County) and analyzed the data using log binomial regression.
Results:
Adjusting for socioeconomic position and tumor characteristics, in models using the imputed data, reduced the PR for the black versus white excess risk of being ER--from 1.76 (95% CI: 1.66, 1.86; adjusted for age and catchment area) to 1.47 (95% CI: 1.38, 1.56). The latter parameter estimate was 16% greater (i.e., 1.56) in models excluding women with missing ER data, and was 43% greater when estimated using the OR (i.e., 1.82).
Conclusion(S):
Studies on race/ethnicity and ER status that fail to account for missing data and socioeconomic data and report the OR are likely to yield inflated estimates of racial/ethnic disparities in ER status.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies