Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Phylogeny01:23

Phylogeny

Phylogeny is concerned with the evolutionary diversification of organisms or groups of organisms. A group of organisms with a name is called a taxon (singular). Taxa (plural) can span different levels of the evolutionary hierarchy. For instance, the group containing all birds is a taxon (comprising the class Aves), and the group of all species of daisies (the genus Bellis) is a taxon. Phylogenies can likewise include just one genus (i.e., depict species relationships) or span an entire...
Phylogenetic Trees03:21

Phylogenetic Trees

Phylogenetic trees come in many forms. It matters in which sequence the organisms are arranged from the bottom to the top of the tree, but the branches can rotate at their nodes without altering the information. The lines connecting individual nodes can be straight, angled, or even curved.The length of the branches can depict time or the relative amount of change among organisms. For instance, the branch length might indicate the number of amino acid changes in the sequence that underlies the...
Phylogenetic Trees03:21

Phylogenetic Trees

Phylogenetic trees come in many forms. It matters in which sequence the organisms are arranged from the bottom to the top of the tree, but the branches can rotate at their nodes without altering the information. The lines connecting individual nodes can be straight, angled, or even curved.The length of the branches can depict time or the relative amount of change among organisms. For instance, the branch length might indicate the number of amino acid changes in the sequence that underlies the...
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
Microbial Phylogeny01:28

Microbial Phylogeny

Understanding the evolutionary relationships among microorganisms is fundamental to microbial ecology and taxonomy. Phylogenetic trees are essential tools for inferring these relationships, relying primarily on comparative analyses of molecular sequences such as DNA, RNA, or proteins. In microbial studies, these trees typically depict the evolutionary paths of diverse bacterial and archaeal species by mapping genetic differences accumulated over time.Phylogenetic trees are composed of tips,...
The Fossil Record02:56

The Fossil Record

The fossil record documents only a small fraction of all organisms that have ever inhabited Earth. Fossilization is a rare process, and most organisms never become fossils. Moreover, the fossil record only exhibits fossils that have been discovered. Nevertheless, sedimentary rock fossils of long-lived, abundant, hard-bodied organisms dominate the fossil record. These fossils offer valuable information, such as an organism's physical form, behavior, and age. Studying the fossil record helps...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Breeding at higher latitude is associated with higher photoperiodic threshold and delayed reproductive development in a songbird.

Hormones and behavior·2020
Same author

Fossils reveal the complex evolutionary history of the mammalian regionalized spine.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2018
Same author

The macroevolutionary consequences of phenotypic integration: from development to deep time.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2014
Same author

Shape, variance and integration during craniogenesis: contrasting marsupial and placental mammals.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2012
Same author

Of mice and mutations: phenotypic effects of the diabetic db/db and ob/ob mutations on the skull and teeth of mice.

European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry·2008
Same author

Evolutionary acceleration in the most endangered mammal of Canada: speciation and divergence in the Vancouver Island marmot (Rodentia, Sciuridae).

Journal of evolutionary biology·2007

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin
08:57

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Published on: August 14, 2018

Paleontology and the comparative method: ancestral node reconstructions versus observed node values.

P D Polly1

  • 1Molecular and Cellular Biology Section, Division of Biomedical Sciences, Queen Mary and Westfield College, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom. d.polly@qmw.ac.uk

The American Naturalist
|August 19, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Reconstructing ancestral traits using comparative methods can yield wide confidence intervals (CIs). However, this study shows that observed values often fall within these CIs, validating evolutionary node reconstruction techniques.

More Related Videos

Reconstructing Terrestrial Paleoclimate and Paleoecology with Fossil Leaves Using Digital Leaf Physiognomy and Leaf Mass Per Area
10:14

Reconstructing Terrestrial Paleoclimate and Paleoecology with Fossil Leaves Using Digital Leaf Physiognomy and Leaf Mass Per Area

Published on: October 25, 2024

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
12:00

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin
08:57

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Published on: August 14, 2018

Reconstructing Terrestrial Paleoclimate and Paleoecology with Fossil Leaves Using Digital Leaf Physiognomy and Leaf Mass Per Area
10:14

Reconstructing Terrestrial Paleoclimate and Paleoecology with Fossil Leaves Using Digital Leaf Physiognomy and Leaf Mass Per Area

Published on: October 25, 2024

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
12:00

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Paleontology
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Phylogenetics

Background:

  • Comparative methods estimate ancestral trait values, but confidence intervals (CIs) can exceed observed data ranges.
  • Distinguishing evolutionary lability from methodological error in CIs is challenging without historical data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the accuracy of ancestral node value estimation using a well-resolved fossil carnivoran phylogeny.
  • To compare observed ancestral values with estimates from a Brownian motion model, incorporating fossil data.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a complete phylogeny of fossil carnivorans with data at tips, branches, and nodes.
  • Compared observed ancestral node values against estimates derived from a Brownian motion model.
  • Evaluated CIs using both paleontological and terminal taxa rate estimates.

Main Results:

  • Confidence intervals for ancestral estimates were wider than tip data ranges, yet observed values were within these CIs.
  • Observed values closely approximated predictions from comparative methods.
  • Paleontological rate estimates yielded CIs comparable to those from terminal taxa alone.
  • The Brownian motion model effectively predicted ancestral node values.

Conclusions:

  • Evolutionary trait reconstruction methods are valuable, even with large standard errors, due to evolutionary conservatism.
  • The Brownian motion model is a reliable predictor of evolutionary change in ancestral traits for this dataset.