Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Incomplete Dominance

Incomplete Dominance

Gregor Mendel's work (1822 - 1884) was primarily focused on pea plants. Through his initial experiments, he determined that every gene in a diploid cell has two variants called alleles inherited from each parent. He suggested that amongst these two alleles, one allele is dominant in character and the other recessive. The combination of alleles determines the phenotype of a gene in an organism.

Competition

Competition

When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.Intraspecific competition, which occurs between individuals of the same species, serves as a natural mechanism for regulating population size. Too much...

Microbial Interactions: Competition

Microbial Interactions: Competition

Microbial competition is an ecological interaction in which microorganisms vie for limited resources within shared environments. These resources may include nutrients, space, or light, depending on the system. The intensity and outcome of competition are influenced by the environmental context, such as nutrient availability, spatial constraints, and the diversity of microbial species present. These competitive interactions significantly influence the structure, function, and resilience of...

Limits to Natural Selection

Limits to Natural Selection

Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.For one, natural selection can only act upon existing genetic variation. Hypothetically, redtusks may enhance elephant survival by deterring ivory-seeking poachers. However, if there are no gene variants—or alleles—for redtusks, natural selection cannot increase the prevalence of...

Inclusive Fitness

Inclusive Fitness

Most altruistic behavior—in which one animal helps another at a cost to themselves—occurs between relatives. Scientists think these altruistic behaviors evolved because they increase the inclusive fitness of the animal providing help.

Ecological Niches

Ecological Niches

All organisms have a position within an ecosystem. The complete set of living and nonliving factors—including food resources, climate, and terrain—that define the position of a given organism are collectively referred to as the organism’s ecological niche.Multiple species cannot occupy the exact same niche within their habitat. If the niches of two or more species overlap to a large extent, the competitive exclusion principle dictates that one species will outcompete the other, forcing it to...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Direction and Progression of Thermal Acclimation Effects on Ciliated Protist Populations Both Depend on Direction of Thermal Change.

Ecology and evolution·2026

Same author

The existence and strength of higher order interactions is sensitive to environmental context.

Ecology·2023

Same author

Decline effects are rare in ecology: Reply.

Ecology·2023

Same author

How much does the typical ecological meta-analysis overestimate the true mean effect size?

Ecology and evolution·2022

Same author

Decline effects are rare in ecology.

Ecology·2022

Same author

Editorial Expression of Concern.

The American naturalist·2021

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Assessing Dominant-Submissive Behavior in Adult Rats Following Traumatic Brain Injury

Assessing Dominant-Submissive Behavior in Adult Rats Following Traumatic Brain Injury

Published on: December 16, 2022

Testing a simple rule for dominance in resource competition.

¹Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Natural Resources, Cook College, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901-8551, USA.

The American Naturalist

|August 19, 2008

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Resource competition models predict species dominance based on resource reduction. This study found that while low resource levels predict dominance in protist competition, competitive exclusion was not always observed, highlighting model limitations.

More Related Videos

Assessing Social Dominance in Mouse Models Using the Tube Test

Assessing Social Dominance in Mouse Models Using the Tube Test

Published on: June 6, 2025

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Assessing Dominant-Submissive Behavior in Adult Rats Following Traumatic Brain Injury

Assessing Dominant-Submissive Behavior in Adult Rats Following Traumatic Brain Injury

Published on: December 16, 2022

Assessing Social Dominance in Mouse Models Using the Tube Test

Assessing Social Dominance in Mouse Models Using the Tube Test

Published on: June 6, 2025

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

Area of Science:

Ecology
Microbial Ecology
Community Ecology

Background:

Resource competition is a key driver of community structure.
Minimal competition models predict species exclusion based on resource reduction levels.
The robustness of these models to real-world complexities is not well understood.

Purpose of the Study:

To test the "R* rule" prediction of competitive dominance in bacterivorous protists.
To investigate how environmental productivity affects competition outcomes and species abundances.
To assess the impact of protists on bacterial density under varying conditions.

Main Methods:

Competition experiments using four bacterivorous protist species in laboratory microcosms.
Measurement of protist R* values to predict competitive outcomes.
Analysis of species abundances and bacterial densities across different productivity levels.

Main Results:

Protists with lower R* values were less impacted by competition, and R* values predicted dominance.
Competitive exclusion was not always observed, with protists often coexisting.
Bacterial densities increased with productivity, contrary to expectations, and protist effects on bacteria varied.

Conclusions:

The R* rule can predict competitive dominance but not necessarily exclusion.
Simple competition models have limitations when applied to complex microbial communities.
Bacterial heterogeneity and productivity influence competition dynamics and protist-prey interactions.