Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy
09:11

Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy

Published on: April 9, 2019

Efficient use of continuous, real-time prostate localization.

Kathleen T Malinowski1, Camille Noel, Meghana Roy

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.

Physics in Medicine and Biology
|August 20, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Recurrent ZC3H18 mutations stabilize oncogenic endogenous retroviral RNA.

Cell reports·2026
Same author

Early Adoption of Thyroid Radiofrequency Ablation in Canada: Physician Experiences, Barriers, and Facilitators to Implementation.

Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale·2026
Same author

Severe Maternal Morbidity and Breastfeeding Among Nulliparous Individuals in the United States.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same author

Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on Palliative Care Test Questions: A Mixed Methods Study.

Journal of palliative medicine·2026
Same author

Examining multilevel resilience as a moderator of associations between gendered racial microaggressions and postpartum mental health and functioning.

Journal of psychiatric research·2026
Same author

Genomic, Clinical, and Spatial Predictors of Durable Response to BRAF/MEK Inhibition in <i>BRAF</i>-Mutant Melanoma.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Effective contrast-enhanced preprocessing for intracranial artery segmentation in digital subtraction angiography.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Improving Plan Quality in Adaptive Proton Therapy Using an Interactive Dose Modification Tool.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Technical Note: Real-Time MLC Control and Latency Measurement Optimization with External Verification.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Fetus-Specific Hematopoietic Stem Cell Dosimetry Framework for Leukemia-Relevant Target Cells During Prenatal Development.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Deep learning-based dose prediction to enhance planning efficiency in cervical brachytherapy with hybrid applicators.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum: Referenceless MR thermometry-a comparison of five methods (2017<i>Phys. Med. Biol</i>.<b>62</b>1-16).

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
See all related articles

Radiation therapy for prostate cancer can be optimized by monitoring prostate movement. New strategies for radiation gating and patient repositioning minimize treatment time while maintaining accuracy for smaller margins.

Area of Science:

  • Radiation Oncology
  • Medical Physics
  • Prostate Cancer Treatment

Background:

  • Technological advancements enable real-time monitoring of prostate motion during radiation delivery.
  • Accurate patient positioning is crucial for effective prostate cancer radiation therapy.
  • Understanding prostate movement variability informs treatment strategy optimization.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify optimal radiation gating and patient repositioning strategies for prostate cancer treatment.
  • To determine interventions that minimize treatment time while maintaining positional accuracy.
  • To evaluate the necessity of interventions for different planning margins.

Main Methods:

  • Simulated interventions using previously published data from 35 patients undergoing continuous prostate localization.

More Related Videos

A New Technique for Treating Low-risk Prostate Cancer&#8212;Super Active Surveillance
05:19

A New Technique for Treating Low-risk Prostate Cancer—Super Active Surveillance

Published on: November 7, 2025

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
06:08

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound

Published on: March 21, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy
09:11

Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy

Published on: April 9, 2019

A New Technique for Treating Low-risk Prostate Cancer&#8212;Super Active Surveillance
05:19

A New Technique for Treating Low-risk Prostate Cancer—Super Active Surveillance

Published on: November 7, 2025

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
06:08

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound

Published on: March 21, 2025

  • Assessed various radiation gating and patient repositioning protocols.
  • Defined acceptable response protocols ensuring 95% of prostates remained within planning margins 95% of the time.

    • Main Results:

    • Gating and repositioning were unnecessary for 7 and 10 mm margins due to infrequent prostate excursions.
    • Intervention was routinely required for 3 and 5 mm margins.
    • For remote repositioning, immediate couch adjustment upon excursion was most time-efficient.
    • For in-room repositioning, manual gating (11s for 3mm, 21s for 5mm margins) before interruption reduced overall time and improved accuracy.

    Conclusions:

    • Radiation gating and patient repositioning strategies are essential for smaller planning margins (3-5 mm) in prostate cancer radiation therapy.
    • Optimized intervention protocols can minimize treatment time and enhance accuracy.
    • Real-time monitoring facilitates adaptive treatment adjustments for improved outcomes.