Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
Published on: April 1, 2016
What is in a name? Understanding the implications of participant terminology
Roger Bibace1, Joshua W Clegg, Jaan Valsiner
1Department of Psychology, Clark University, Worcester, MA 01610, USA. rbibace@clarku.edu
Abstract:
The authors discuss the history of research terminology in American psychology with respect to the various labels given to those upon whom we conduct research ("observer"-"subject"-"participant"-"client"). This history is supplemented with an analysis of participant terminology in APA manuals from four historical eras, from the 1950s to the present. The general trend in participant terminology reflects the overall trends in American psychology, beginning with a complex lexicon that admitted both the passive and the active research participant, followed by a dominance of the passive term 'subject' and ending with the terminological ambiguity and multiplicity reflected in contemporary psychology. This selective history serves to contextualize a discussion of the meaning, functions, and implications of the transformations in, and debates over, participant terminology.
Related Concept Videos
Role-Based Identity
Personal Identity
Drug Nomenclature
Ethics in Research
Deindividuation
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
