Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Evaluation of screening programs].

M Kaminski1, B Blondel

  • 1INSERM Unité 149, Recherche Epidémiologique sur la Mère et l'Enfant, Villejuif.

Revue D'Epidemiologie Et De Sante Publique
|January 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Residual sagittal imbalance is associated with early hip degeneration after long lumbosacral fusion: an EOS-based study of 119 patients.

Spine deformity·2026
Same author

Factors influencing complications after 3-columns spinal osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance from multiple etiologies: a multicentric cohort study about 286 cases in 273 patients.

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society·2022
Same author

Comparison of the performance of estimated fetal weight charts for the detection of small- and large-for-gestational age newborns with adverse outcomes: a French population-based study.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2021
Same author

[Poliovirus and apoptosis].

Virologie (Montrouge, France)·2021
Same author

Surgery for spinal deformity in Parkinson's disease patients: What are we missing?

Neuro-Chirurgie·2021
Same author

International comparisons and holistic patient care.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2021

Assessing screening programs requires careful consideration of benefits and harms, especially for healthy individuals. Evaluating false positives, test accuracy, and treatment availability is crucial for accurate public health intervention analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Epidemiology
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Screening programs target healthy, asymptomatic individuals.
  • Positive screening results necessitate further investigation or treatment.
  • Assessing screening programs differs significantly from evaluating other public health interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight specific considerations for evaluating public health screening programs.
  • To emphasize the importance of minimizing hazards associated with false positive screening results.
  • To underscore the need for comprehensive evaluation methods for screening interventions.

Main Methods:

  • Discusses key aspects of screening program assessment.
  • Emphasizes the role of predictive value, disease prevalence, and diagnostic accuracy.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Stresses the importance of available effective treatments post-screening.

    • Main Results:

    • False positive results pose significant hazards that must be managed.
    • The predictive value of a screening test is influenced by disease prevalence.
    • Effective treatments are essential to justify positive screening outcomes.

    Conclusions:

    • Comprehensive evaluation must include both positive and negative health effects.
    • Psychological and social consequences of screening programs require thorough assessment.
    • Rigorous methods are needed to accurately evaluate the overall impact of screening programs.