Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026
X-ray Dose Reduction through Adaptive Exposure in Fluoroscopic Imaging
Published on: September 11, 2011
Image quality of digital direct flat-panel mammography versus an analog screen-film technique using a low-contrast
Kathrin Barbara Krug1, Hartmut Stützer, René Schröder
1Department of Radiology, University of Cologne Medical School, Kerpenerstrasse 62, Cologne NRW 50924, Germany. barbara.krug@uk-koeln.de
Objective:
The objective of our study was to compare the detectability and distinguishability of simulated soft-tissue opacities of 50 variants of an anthropomorphic breast phantom in mammograms acquired with a digital direct flat-panel detector versus an analog system; we also compared the image settings "analog film," "digital film," and "digital monitor."
Materials And Methods:
The studies were performed on digital (Lorad Selenia) and analog (Mammomat 3) mammography systems. Four hundred fifty silicone cubes devised with different randomly distributed columns, holes, or both columns and holes (diameter, 3-7 mm; height, 0.5-4.0 mm) were used as test bodies. One experimental series was performed with a silicone scatter body and one with a silicone and an anthropomorphic ground-meat scatter body. All x-rays were obtained at identical settings and exposures. Four radiologists rated the films and monitor-displayed images independently of each other in randomized order on a standardized electronic questionnaire.
Results:
The digital monitor technique generally scored better than digital film viewing and analog readings. The McNemar test for multiple paired comparisons mostly yielded a p value of < 0.0005. The smallest volume category counted as the most valid test scenario for all raters, where the percentage of correct positive findings ranged between 30% and 58% (analog technique), 43% and 68% (digital film viewing), and 55% and 66% (monitor viewing). The corresponding accuracy rates were 77-93%, 75-95%, and 81-85%, respectively, with kappa values of 0.2-0.5 (analog) and 0.3-0.6 (digital) for comparing the gold standard with raters' evaluations.
Conclusion:
Digital flat-panel mammography is superior to the analog screen-film method for the detection of simulated opacities.
Related Concept Videos
01:24X-ray Imaging
01:26Phase Contrast and Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy
In-phase-contrast microscopes, interference between light directly passing through a cell and light refracted by cellular components is used to create high-contrast, high-resolution images without staining. It is the oldest and simplest type of microscope that creates an image by altering the wavelengths of light rays passing through the specimen. Altered wavelength paths are created using an annular stop in the condenser. The annular stop produces a hollow cone of...