Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Motor Units00:46

Motor Units

62.0K
A motor unit consists of two main components: a single efferent motor neuron (i.e., a neuron that carries impulses away from the central nervous system) and all of the muscle fibers it innervates. The motor neuron may innervate multiple muscle fibers, which are single cells, but only one motor neuron innervates a single muscle fiber.
62.0K
Motor Units01:13

Motor Units

8.2K
The motor unit is a fundamental component of the neuromuscular system and plays a crucial role in coordinating muscle contractions. It consists of a somatic motor neuron, which connects and controls multiple skeletal muscle fibers, forming a single functional segment. The axon of the motor neuron branches out and establishes synaptic connections known as neuromuscular junctions with individual muscle fibers within the motor unit.
Motor units come in different sizes, with smaller units...
8.2K
Motor Unit Stimulation01:20

Motor Unit Stimulation

3.9K
When the neuron of a motor unit fires an action potential, it triggers a series of events, leading to a twitch contraction in the muscle fibers. The process of excitation-contraction coupling is crucial in relaying the action potential to the muscle fibers.
The latent period of contraction marks the onset of excitation-contraction coupling, when the action potential propagates across the sarcolemma, preparing the muscle fibers for contraction. As the fibers enter the contraction phase, the...
3.9K
Interference and Diffraction02:18

Interference and Diffraction

52.5K
Interference is a characteristic phenomenon exhibited by waves. When two electromagnetic waves interact with their peaks and troughs coinciding, a resulting wave with enhanced amplitude is produced. This is known as constructive interference. In this case, the two waves interacting are in phase with each other.
52.5K
RNA Interference01:23

RNA Interference

28.2K
RNA interference (RNAi) is a process in which a small non-coding RNA molecule blocks the post-transcriptional expression of a gene by binding to its messenger RNA (mRNA) and preventing the protein from being translated.
This process occurs naturally in cells, often through the activity of genomically-encoded microRNAs. Researchers can take advantage of this mechanism by introducing synthetic RNAs to deactivate specific genes for research or therapeutic purposes. For example, RNAi could be used...
28.2K
Accelerators01:17

Accelerators

292
Accelerators in concrete serve as admixtures to speed up the hardening process, enabling the concrete to achieve early strength faster. Although accelerators do not necessarily impact the time it takes concrete to set, they reduce this time in practice. A common accelerator is calcium chloride, which is particularly useful for hastening early strength development in cold weather or for rapid repair jobs that require quick heat generation after mixing.
The effectiveness of calcium chloride can...
292

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neural decoding from surface high-density EMG signals: influence of anatomy and synchronization on the number of identified motor units.

Journal of neural engineering·2022
Same author

Mathematical relationships between spinal motoneuron properties.

eLife·2022
Same author

Standard intensities of transcranial alternating current stimulation over the motor cortex do not entrain corticospinal inputs to motor neurons.

The Journal of physiology·2022
Same author

Correlation networks of spinal motor neurons that innervate lower limb muscles during a multi-joint isometric task.

The Journal of physiology·2022
Same author

Reducing the Calibration Time in Somatosensory BCI by Using Tactile ERD.

IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society·2022
Same author

The control and training of single motor units in isometric tasks are constrained by a common input signal.

eLife·2022
Same journal

Torque provides a more comprehensive assessment of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty lateralization than moment arms or muscle forces.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same journal

Age-related adaptations in acceleration and deceleration control during gait.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same journal

Regional mechanical differences in hamstring muscles after removal of surrounding connective tissue.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same journal

A novel knee joint laxity measurement device in mice.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same journal

Influence of iliofemoral ligament laxity on hip joint contact forces during gait.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same journal

Associations of sagittal spinal alignment with shear wave velocity, thickness, and echo intensity of muscles attached to the spine and pelvis in healthy women.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Author Spotlight: Studying Neuromuscular Responses and Motor Neuron Plasticity in Neurodegenerative Diseases
06:08

Author Spotlight: Studying Neuromuscular Responses and Motor Neuron Plasticity in Neurodegenerative Diseases

Published on: April 19, 2024

827

Motor unit acceleration maps and interference mechanomyographic distribution.

Dario Farina1, Xi Li, Pascal Madeleine

  • 1Department of Health Science and Technology, Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction (SMI), Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 7D-3, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark. df@hst.aau.dk

Journal of Biomechanics
|August 30, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study maps surface mechanomyography (MMG) signals from single motor units in the tibialis anterior muscle. Motor unit location significantly influences the recorded MMG signal distribution, impacting motor unit acceleration maps (MUAMs).

More Related Videos

Non-Invasive Modulation and Robotic Mapping of Motor Cortex in the Developing Brain
08:26

Non-Invasive Modulation and Robotic Mapping of Motor Cortex in the Developing Brain

Published on: July 1, 2019

7.1K
CMAP Scan MUNE MScan - A Novel Motor Unit Number Estimation MUNE Method
08:25

CMAP Scan MUNE MScan - A Novel Motor Unit Number Estimation MUNE Method

Published on: June 7, 2018

12.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Author Spotlight: Studying Neuromuscular Responses and Motor Neuron Plasticity in Neurodegenerative Diseases
06:08

Author Spotlight: Studying Neuromuscular Responses and Motor Neuron Plasticity in Neurodegenerative Diseases

Published on: April 19, 2024

827
Non-Invasive Modulation and Robotic Mapping of Motor Cortex in the Developing Brain
08:26

Non-Invasive Modulation and Robotic Mapping of Motor Cortex in the Developing Brain

Published on: July 1, 2019

7.1K
CMAP Scan MUNE MScan - A Novel Motor Unit Number Estimation MUNE Method
08:25

CMAP Scan MUNE MScan - A Novel Motor Unit Number Estimation MUNE Method

Published on: June 7, 2018

12.9K

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Neuroscience
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Surface mechanomyography (MMG) offers a non-invasive method to assess muscle activity.
  • Understanding the spatial distribution of MMG signals is crucial for accurate muscle function analysis.
  • Previous studies have not fully quantified the impact of motor unit location on MMG signal characteristics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the two-dimensional distribution of surface MMG signals from single motor units in the tibialis anterior.
  • To investigate how motor unit location influences the generated surface mechanomyographic signals and motor unit acceleration maps (MUAMs).

Main Methods:

  • Recorded surface MMG signals using a 3x4 grid of accelerometers on the tibialis anterior in 12 healthy volunteers.
  • Simultaneously recorded intramuscular electromyographic (EMG) signals to identify and trigger specific motor unit activations.
  • Averaged MMG signals triggered by intramuscular single motor unit action potentials to create MUAMs.

Main Results:

  • The peak-to-peak amplitude of averaged MMG signals was significantly dependent on motor unit location (P<0.001).
  • Accelerometer position within the grid also affected MMG amplitude (P<0.05).
  • A significant interaction between motor unit location and accelerometer position influenced MUAM amplitude, confirming location-dependent effects.

Conclusions:

  • Motor unit location within the tibialis anterior muscle demonstrably influences the recorded surface MMG signal.
  • This study provides a quantitative analysis of how volume conduction affects surface MMG signals, particularly MUAMs.
  • Findings are essential for refining MMG-based assessments of muscle activation and motor control.