Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026
05:39
Non-Intubated Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery
Published on: May 26, 2023
Breast augmentation under general anesthesia versus monitored anesthesia care: a retrospective comparative study
Liron Eldor1, Avi Weissman, Lucian Fodor
1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus and Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Annals of Plastic Surgery
|August 30, 2008
Summary
Monitored anesthesia care (MAC) offers advantages over general anesthesia (GA) for breast augmentation, resulting in less vomiting and shorter hospital stays. Patient preference leaned towards MAC for this popular cosmetic procedure.
Area of Science:
- Plastic Surgery
- Anesthesiology
Background:
- Breast augmentation is a highly popular aesthetic surgery with high patient satisfaction.
- Immediate postoperative complications include pain, nausea, and vomiting, impacting patient recovery.
- Anesthetic technique choice is crucial for managing patient experience and outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare general anesthesia (GA) and monitored anesthesia care (MAC) for breast augmentation from an anesthetic perspective.
- To evaluate postoperative outcomes, including hospital stay, pain, nausea, and vomiting, between GA and MAC.
- To assess patient preference for anesthetic techniques in breast augmentation procedures.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 115 breast augmentation patient charts over two years.
- Categorization of patients based on anesthetic technique: 69 under MAC and 46 under GA.
- Statistical analysis using Mann-Whitney test to compare outcomes between groups.
Main Results:
- Patients under MAC experienced significantly shorter postoperative hospital stays (11.7 hours) compared to GA (16.1 hours).
- The frequency of postoperative vomiting was significantly lower in the MAC group (0.22 times/patient) versus the GA group (0.5 times/patient).
- Submuscular implant placement was associated with significantly higher postoperative pain scores (VAS 5) than subglandular placement (VAS 3.27).
Conclusions:
- Monitored anesthesia care (MAC) is associated with reduced postoperative vomiting and shorter hospitalizations for breast augmentation compared to general anesthesia (GA).
- Patient preference indicates a tendency towards MAC when offered a choice for breast augmentation.
- Implant placement plane significantly influences postoperative pain levels, independent of anesthetic technique.
Related Concept Videos
01:24General Anesthesia: Overview
Anesthesia is a medical procedure that uses drugs for CNS suppression to enable painless surgeries and procedures. The selection of anesthetics is influenced by their pharmacokinetic properties, side effects, and patient characteristics. Various types of anesthesia include general, local, regional, spinal, and inhalational.
General anesthesia induces unconsciousness in the whole body, while the others target specific areas or sensations. It is administered to minimize adverse effects, maintain...
General anesthesia induces unconsciousness in the whole body, while the others target specific areas or sensations. It is administered to minimize adverse effects, maintain...
01:22Stages of General Anesthesia
Various sedation levels offer significant advantages in facilitating procedural interventions for patients undergoing medical or invasive surgical procedures. These levels span from anxiolysis to general anesthesia, providing a spectrum of sedative effects to cater to specific patient needs. Anxiolysis reduces anxiety and is achieved through minimal sedation, enabling patients to remain awake and responsive while feeling more at ease during the procedure. This level can benefit minor...