Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing
Published on: August 16, 2024
Factor structure of the developmental behavior checklist using confirmatory factor analysis of polytomous items
Daniel E Bontempo1, Scott M Hofer, Andrew Mackinnon
1Oregon State University, Human Development and Family Sciences, 220 Bates Hall, Corvallis, OR, 97331 USA. Daniel.Bontempo@oregonstate.edu
The Developmental Behavior Checklist (DBC) subscales show good psychometric properties for assessing behavioral and emotional issues in individuals with intellectual deficit (ID). Larger subscales are reliable, while smaller ones require careful consideration for individual differences research.
Area of Science:
- Psychometrics
- Clinical Psychology
- Developmental Psychology
Background:
- The Developmental Behavior Checklist (DBC) is a 95-item screening tool for behavioral and emotional disturbances in individuals with intellectual deficit (ID).
- It comprises five principal-component derived subscales: Disruptive, Self-Absorbed, Communication Disturbance, Anxiety, and Social Relating.
- Validating these subscales for individual differences research necessitates examining structural stability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To psychometrically evaluate the DBC's subscale structure using item-level data.
- To investigate simple-structure restrictions and the impact of factorially complex items on inter-subscale correlations.
- To assess the suitability of DBC subscales for individual differences research.
Main Methods:
- A polytomous confirmatory factor analysis (PCFA) was performed on the DBC item-level data.
- Factor loadings and inter-factor correlations were analyzed with and without simple-structure restrictions.
- The psychometric properties of the five DBC subscales were examined.
Main Results:
- The two largest subscales, Disruptive/Antisocial and Self-Absorbed, demonstrated robust performance in PCFA models.
- These larger subscales are likely to exhibit minimal bias under unit-weighted scoring and latent factor models.
- Findings for the Communication Disturbance, Social Relating, and Anxiety subscales, while not invalidating their use, highlight areas for careful consideration in individual differences research.
Conclusions:
- The study provides evidence supporting the psychometric integrity of the larger DBC subscales for research applications.
- Researchers utilizing the smaller DBC subscales in individual differences studies should be aware of specific psychometric considerations.
- This research contributes to the ongoing validation of the DBC as a tool for assessing behavioral and emotional disturbances in ID populations.
Related Concept Videos
Factorial Design
Cattell's 16 Personality Factors
In contrast, source traits are the fundamental,...
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Reliability and Validity
Three Developmental Domains
Physical Development
Physical processes, also known as maturation, encompass the biological changes that occur across an individual's life. These changes begin with genetic inheritance and continue through various stages, including growth in height and weight,...
Conduct Disorder

