Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Translational Rabbit Model of Chronic Cardiac Pacing
Published on: January 6, 2023
Predictors of improved quality of life 1 year after pacemaker implantation
J W Martijn van Eck1, Norbert M van Hemel, Arjan van den Bos
1Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. j.w.m.vaneck-2@umcutrecht.nl
Background:
Patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of pacemaker (PM) patients has increasingly become an important issue of health care evaluation. Currently, knowledge of pacing performance and technology is more or less outlined. However, determinants of poor or good HRQoL of paced patients require further elucidation.
Objectives:
The purpose of this study is to determine the HRQoL 1 year after PM implantation and predictors of differences in HRQoL between pre- and post-PM implantation.
Methods:
We quantified the mean differences between HRQoL before implantation (baseline) and 1 year later, assessed with the generic Medical Outcomes Survey 36-Item Short-Form Survey and EuroQol (EQ5D), and the PM patient-specific AQUAREL (Assessment of QUality of life And RElated events) questionnaires, in 501 consecutively included patients in the Dutch multicenter longitudinal FOLLOWPACE cohort study. Multivariable linear regression modeling was then performed to determine predictive factors of the HRQoL 1 year after implantation.
Results:
The HRQoL of the patients increased markedly in the first year after implantation. Seventy percent of the patients considered their health improved, whereas 11% experienced a complete recovery in HRQoL. The most important predictors for improved HRQoL after 1 year were HRQoL at baseline, age, presence of cardiac comorbidities, and atrial fibrillation with slow ventricular response as indication for chronic pacing.
Conclusion:
In most patients receiving a PM, HRQoL increased in the first year after PM implantation. Knowledge of the predictors of this increase may aid physicians to timely differentiate between patients who most likely will benefit most from PM implantation in terms of HRQoL.
More Related Videos
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
16:40A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac muscle...
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management