Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Word length vs. lexical factors: Re-examining what causes the word-length effect in serial recognition.

Memory & cognition·2025

Same author

Similar phonemes create interference in the serial recall task.

Memory (Hove, England)·2024

Same author

Neighborhood frequency effects in simple and complex span: Do high-frequency neighbors help or hurt?

Memory & cognition·2024

Same author

Distinctiveness, not dual coding, explains the picture-superiority effect.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2024

Same author

Valence and concreteness in item recognition: Evidence against the affective embodiment account.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2023

Same author

Set size and the orthographic/phonological neighbourhood size effect in serial recognition: The importance of randomization.

Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale·2023

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 1, 2026

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

Directly assessing the relationship between irrelevant speech and irrelevant tapping.

Aimée M Surprenant¹, Ian Neath, Tamra J Bireta

¹Department of Psychology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Newfoundland, Canada. asurpren@mun.ca

Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology = Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Experimentale

|September 10, 2008

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

The acoustic confusion effect, where similar-sounding words impair memory recall, is similarly affected by irrelevant speech and tapping. Both auditory distractions reduce this memory effect, indicating a shared underlying mechanism impacting recall performance.

More Related Videos

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Uncovering Beat Deafness: Detecting Rhythm Disorders with Synchronized Finger Tapping and Perceptual Timing Tasks

Uncovering Beat Deafness: Detecting Rhythm Disorders with Synchronized Finger Tapping and Perceptual Timing Tasks

Published on: March 16, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 1, 2026

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Uncovering Beat Deafness: Detecting Rhythm Disorders with Synchronized Finger Tapping and Perceptual Timing Tasks

Uncovering Beat Deafness: Detecting Rhythm Disorders with Synchronized Finger Tapping and Perceptual Timing Tasks

Published on: March 16, 2015

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Auditory Perception
Memory Research

Background:

The acoustic confusion effect demonstrates poorer recall for similar-sounding items.
Concurrent irrelevant speech and tapping have been shown to reduce this effect.
This suggests potential similarities between speech and tapping manipulations.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the relationship between irrelevant speech and irrelevant tapping.
To determine if these two auditory distractions share common mechanisms affecting memory recall.

Main Methods:

Researchers correlated the memory disruption caused by irrelevant speech with that caused by irrelevant tapping.
The study focused on recall of similar-sounding versus dissimilar-sounding items.

Main Results:

A significant positive correlation was found between the disruptive effects of speech and tapping.
This indicates a shared influence on the acoustic confusion effect.

Conclusions:

Irrelevant speech and tapping share commonalities in their impact on memory recall.
Researchers should consider the magnitude of effects, not just their presence, when studying auditory distractions.