Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

18.3K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
18.3K
Perceptual Constancy01:12

Perceptual Constancy

391
Perceptual constancy is the ability to recognize that objects remain consistent and unchanged even when their appearance varies due to changes in sensory input. There are four main types of perceptual constancy: size constancy, shape constancy, color constancy, and brightness constancy.
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
391
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

6.4K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
6.4K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

12.9K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.9K
Attribution Theory00:56

Attribution Theory

13.0K
Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958).
13.0K
The Representativeness Heuristic02:13

The Representativeness Heuristic

15.8K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
15.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Word length vs. lexical factors: Re-examining what causes the word-length effect in serial recognition.

Memory & cognition·2025
Same author

Similar phonemes create interference in the serial recall task.

Memory (Hove, England)·2024
Same author

Neighborhood frequency effects in simple and complex span: Do high-frequency neighbors help or hurt?

Memory & cognition·2024
Same author

Productions Need Not Match Study Items to Confer a Production Advantage, But It Helps.

Experimental psychology·2024
Same author

Valence and concreteness in item recognition: Evidence against the affective embodiment account.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2023
Same author

Set size and the orthographic/phonological neighbourhood size effect in serial recognition: The importance of randomization.

Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale·2023
Same journal

EXPRESS: Age-related Differences in Recognition Memory for Discourse: The Case of Modified Words, Competitors, and Related Lures.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Exaggerated Self-Referencing in Body Dysmorphic Disorder.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Post-Error Adjustments: The role of Response Stimulus Intervals and error placement.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Mitigating the Low Prevalence Effect: Role of Removing Explicit "Target-Absent" Responses in Visual Search.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Visual Selection Is Spatially Constrained During Working Memory Consolidation.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Cross-Phoneme Generalisation of Dimension-Based Statistical Learning for Stop Voicing: Probing Subject Design and Word Frame Effects.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 3, 2025

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

7.8K

Distinctiveness, not dual coding, explains the picture-superiority effect.

Kate F Higdon1,2, Ian Neath3, Aimée M Surprenant3

  • 1California State University, Bakersfield, USA.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
|February 15, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Memory for pictures is better than for words due to distinctiveness, not dual-coding. This study confirms that making words more distinct eliminates the picture-superiority effect.

Keywords:
Picture-Superiority effectassociative recognitiondistinctivenessdual codingfree recall

More Related Videos

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

17.3K
How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
14:34

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

75.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 3, 2025

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

7.8K
Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

17.3K
How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
14:34

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

75.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Memory Research

Background:

  • The picture-superiority effect describes enhanced memory for pictures over words.
  • Dual-coding theory suggests pictures are better remembered due to verbal labeling, while distinctiveness accounts attribute this to greater visual variability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether physical distinctiveness or dual-coding theory better explains the picture-superiority effect.
  • To extend previous findings on distinctiveness to associative recognition and free recall tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Manipulating the physical distinctiveness of words (varying font styles, sizes, colors) and pictures (black-and-white vs. color).
  • Testing participants on old/new recognition, forced-choice recognition, associative recognition, and free recall.

Main Results:

  • The picture-superiority effect was eliminated when comparing less distinctive black-and-white pictures to highly distinctive words.
  • Results across multiple memory tasks consistently supported the role of physical distinctiveness.

Conclusions:

  • Physical distinctiveness, rather than dual-coding, is a more viable explanation for the picture-superiority effect.
  • The findings challenge the traditional dual-coding theory's explanation of why pictures are better remembered than words.