Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Calculating and Interpreting the Linear Correlation Coefficient01:11

Calculating and Interpreting the Linear Correlation Coefficient

The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable, x, and the dependent variable, y. Hence, it is also known as the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient. It can be calculated using the following equation:
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
The...
Coefficient of Correlation01:12

Coefficient of Correlation

The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable x and the dependent variable y.
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the strength of the linear...
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Correlation of Experimental Data01:23

Correlation of Experimental Data

Dimensional analysis simplifies complex physical problems and guides experimental investigations, but it does not provide complete solutions. It identifies the dimensionless groups that influence a phenomenon, but experimental data is needed to establish the specific relationships and validate theoretical predictions.
For example, a spherical particle moving through a viscous fluid experiences drag. Dimensional analysis shows that the drag force depends on the particle's diameter, velocity, and...
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures from...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development of character strengths across the deployment cycle among U.S. Army soldiers.

Journal of personality·2020
Same author

Point-biserial correlation: Interval estimation, hypothesis testing, meta-analysis, and sample size determination.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2019
Same author

Interval estimation for linear functions of medians in within-subjects and mixed designs.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2019
Same author

Varying coefficient meta-analysis methods for odds ratios and risk ratios.

Psychological methods·2015
Same author

CFA with binary variables in small samples: a comparison of two methods.

Frontiers in psychology·2015
Same author

Meta-analysis methods for risk differences.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2013
Same journal

Bayesian evaluation for latent variable models: A tutorial on computing information criteria and bayes factors with the r package bleval.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

A stochastic block prior for clustering in graphical models.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Three-level vector autoregressive models.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Scaling cognitive modeling to big data: A deep learning approach to studying individual differences in evidence accumulation model parameters.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Best practices in multilevel modeling for within-cluster group comparisons: An evaluation of coding strategies reflecting group composition and heterogeneity.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

A unified framework for psychometrics in experimental psychology: The standardized generalized hierarchical factor model.

Psychological methods·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 1, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

Meta-analytic interval estimation for bivariate correlations.

Douglas G Bonett1

  • 1Department of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA. dgbonett@iastate.edu

Psychological Methods
|September 10, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Existing meta-analysis methods for correlations have flawed assumptions. This study introduces a new fixed-effects method that performs well even with varied correlations and nonrandomly selected studies.

More Related Videos

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

CorrelationCalculator and Filigree: Tools for Data-Driven Network Analysis of Metabolomics Data
07:11

CorrelationCalculator and Filigree: Tools for Data-Driven Network Analysis of Metabolomics Data

Published on: November 10, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 1, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

CorrelationCalculator and Filigree: Tools for Data-Driven Network Analysis of Metabolomics Data
07:11

CorrelationCalculator and Filigree: Tools for Data-Driven Network Analysis of Metabolomics Data

Published on: November 10, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Psychometrics
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Current meta-analytic methods for bivariate correlations rely on restrictive assumptions, leading to poor performance.
  • Fixed-effects models assume equal population correlations, failing under heterogeneity.
  • Random-effects models, while accommodating heterogeneity, assume random study selection, which is often unrealistic.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the limitations of existing meta-analytic techniques for correlations.
  • To propose a novel fixed-effects meta-analytic confidence interval for bivariate correlations.
  • To develop a method that performs well under correlation heterogeneity and nonrandomly selected studies.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a new fixed-effects meta-analytic confidence interval.
  • Evaluation of the proposed method's performance under conditions of correlation heterogeneity.
  • Assessment of the method's utility with nonrandomly selected studies.

Main Results:

  • The proposed fixed-effects confidence interval is easy to compute.
  • The new method demonstrates robust performance even when population correlations vary.
  • The approach is effective for meta-analyses involving nonrandomly selected studies.

Conclusions:

  • A new, practical fixed-effects meta-analytic method for bivariate correlations is introduced.
  • This method overcomes the limitations of traditional approaches, offering improved accuracy.
  • The proposed technique is suitable for real-world meta-analytic applications with heterogeneous and nonrandomly selected data.