Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2026

In Vitro and In Vivo Assessment of T, B and Myeloid Cells Suppressive Activity and Humoral Responses from Transplant Recipients
Published on: August 12, 2017
Heat inactivation can differentiate between IgG and IgM antibodies in the pretransplant cross match
I A Al-Muzairai1, M Mansour, L Almajed
1Immunology and Organ Transplantation Departments, Hamad Al-Essa Organ Transplantation Center, Kuwait. rana@kma.org.kw
The presence of IgG antibodies in the pretransplant cross-match (XM) test results in hyperacute rejection, but IgM antibodies are inconsequential. The XM should be able to differentiate between IgG and IgM antibodies. This study evaluated 3 methods. This study was based on 500 patients for whom XM were performed between 2004 and 2006 with all 3 techniques. Two patient sera were used: normal serum and heat inactivated serum, which was prepared by incubating patient serum at 63 degrees C for 10 minutes to destroy IgM antibodies. The efficiencies of flow cytometry XM (FC-XM), dithiothreitol complement-dependent microlymphocytotoxicity (DTT/CDC-XM), and heat inactivation (HI-CDC-XM) to differentiate between IgG and IgM were evaluated by using both sera. Patients with positive XM, and negative HI-CDC-XM were reported as negative XM. During the study period, there were 70 patients with positive B-cell XM. Forty-nine became negative after HI-XM, and 21 remained positive. Only 34 cases became negative after DTT-CDC-XM and 36 remained positive. HI-CDC-XM was comparable to FC-XM; all patients testing negative with this technique experienced successful renal transplantations without hyperacute, accelerated, or acute rejection episodes. Our study showed that HI-CDC-XM was effective at exclude donor-specific IgM antibodies, a result which was comparable to FCXM to detect only IgG antibodies. HI is simple and rapid and does not involve any extra equipment or cost.
The presence of IgG antibodies in the pretransplant cross-match (XM) test results in hyperacute rejection, but IgM antibodies are inconsequential. The XM should be able to differentiate between IgG and IgM antibodies. This study evaluated 3 methods. This study was based on 500 patients for whom XM were performed between 2004 and 2006 with all 3 techniques. Two patient sera were used: normal serum and heat inactivated serum, which was prepared by incubating patient serum at 63 degrees C for 10 minutes to destroy IgM antibodies. The efficiencies of flow cytometry XM (FC-XM), dithiothreitol complement-dependent microlymphocytotoxicity (DTT/CDC-XM), and heat inactivation (HI-CDC-XM) to differentiate between IgG and IgM were evaluated by using both sera. Patients with positive XM, and negative HI-CDC-XM were reported as negative XM. During the study period, there were 70 patients with positive B-cell XM. Forty-nine became negative after HI-XM, and 21 remained positive. Only 34 cases became negative after DTT-CDC-XM and 36 remained positive. HI-CDC-XM was comparable to FC-XM; all patients testing negative with this technique experienced successful renal transplantations without hyperacute, accelerated, or acute rejection episodes. Our study showed that HI-CDC-XM was effective at exclude donor-specific IgM antibodies, a result which was comparable to FCXM to detect only IgG antibodies. HI is simple and rapid and does not involve any extra equipment or cost.
Related Concept Videos
Immunoprecipitation
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation
Chromatin immunoprecipitation, also known as ChIP, is used to study protein-DNA or...
Hybridoma Technology
Hybridoma Selection
Commonly used fusion techniques — electroporation, polyethylene glycol...
