Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2026

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Cardiogenic shock developing in the coronary care unit in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction
Giuseppe De Luca1, Stefano Savonitto, Cesare Greco
1Division of Cardiology, 'Maggiore della Carità' Hospital, Eastern Piedmont University 'A. Avogadro', and Centro di Biotecnologie per la Ricerca Medica Applicata (BRMA), Novara, Italy. giuseppe.deluca@med.unipmn.it
Insights
Identifying patients at risk for cardiogenic shock after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction is crucial. Key predictors include Killip class >1, low blood pressure, older age, and diabetes, guiding preventative strategies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Internal Medicine
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) can lead to cardiogenic shock.
- Early identification of high-risk patients is vital for improved outcomes.
- The BLITZ-1 study investigated predictors and outcomes of cardiogenic shock in STEMI patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify clinical predictors of cardiogenic shock development during hospitalization in STEMI patients.
- To describe the outcomes of patients who developed cardiogenic shock.
- To inform preventative strategies for cardiogenic shock in STEMI.
Main Methods:
- Nationwide survey of acute myocardial infarction patients in coronary care units (October 2001).
- Included patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or left bundle branch block/pacemaker.
- 30-day follow-up for major cardiac events post-discharge.
Main Results:
- 1345 patients analyzed; 97 (7.2%) developed cardiogenic shock.
- 71 patients developed shock during hospitalization; 26 upon admission.
- Independent predictors for in-hospital shock: Killip class >1, low systolic BP, older age, unsuccessful reperfusion, diabetes.
- Mortality was high in both groups (71.8% for in-hospital shock, 65.4% for admission shock).
Conclusions:
- Most cardiogenic shock in STEMI occurs post-initial hospitalization.
- Patients with Killip class >1, low systolic BP, and advanced age are at higher risk.
- Early identification enables aggressive therapies (pharmacological, mechanical support, revascularization) to prevent shock.
Introduction:
A relevant proportion of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction may develop cardiogenic shock after presentation, and the identification of these patients would be very important in order to improve their outcome. The aim of the current study was to identify, among patients in the BLITZ-1, the clinical predictors, and describe the outcome of patients who developed cardiogenic shock during hospitalization.
Methods:
The study was a nationwide survey of patients admitted to a coronary care units for an acute myocardial infarction with or without ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in October 2001. The 30-day follow-up was conducted by hospital visits and concerned major cardiac events occurred from hospital discharge.
Results:
A total of 1345 patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or left bundle branch block/pacemaker were included in this analysis. A total of 97 patients (7.2%) had cardiogenic shock, 26 patients at presentation, whereas 71 patients (73.2%) developed shock during hospital stay. Mortality was 71.8% among patients who developed cardiogenic shock during hospitalization as compared with 65.4% among those who were already in shock upon admission (P = 0.54). By multivariable analysis, we identified Killip class more than 1, lower systolic blood pressure at presentation, older age, unsuccessful reperfusion and diabetes as independent predictors of developing shock during hospitalization.
Conclusion:
The present study shows that the largest proportion of cardiogenic shock complicating ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction is observed after initial hospitalization, particularly in patients with Killip class more than 1, low systolic blood pressure at presentation and advanced age. The identification of these patients may help in preventing this complication by more aggressive pharmacological therapies, mechanical haemodynamic support, as well as coronary revascularization.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Introduction Cardiac Emergencies
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
