Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Assessing the impact of protocol design changes on clinical trial performance
Kenneth A Getz1, Julia Wenger, Rafael A Campo
1Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, Tufts University School of Medicine, Tufts University, 75 Kneeland Street, Suite 1100, Boston, MA 02111, USA. kenneth.getz@tufts.edu
Clinical research protocols have become more complex, increasing site workload and worsening study performance. This trend highlights the need for simplified protocol designs to improve efficiency and outcomes in clinical trials.
Area of Science:
- Clinical research methodology
- Drug development and evaluation
Background:
- Protocol design is critical for clinical research success.
- Changes in protocol design over time and their impact on clinical trial performance have not been quantified.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify trends in clinical research protocol design.
- To assess the impact of these design trends on clinical trial performance.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 10,038 unique phase 1-4 protocols (1999-2005).
- Analysis of study conduct performance for 57 phase 2 and 3 protocols at US sites.
- Measurement of procedure frequency, site work burden, cycle time, recruitment/retention rates, amendments, adverse events, and case report form length.
Main Results:
- Unique procedures per protocol increased by 6.5% annually.
- Procedure frequency increased by 8.7% annually.
- Investigative site work burden increased by 10.5% annually.
- Study conduct performance (cycle time, recruitment, retention) worsened.
- Protocol amendments, serious adverse events, and case report form length increased.
Conclusions:
- Clinical trial protocols have significantly increased in complexity between 1999 and 2005.
- Increased protocol complexity negatively impacts clinical trial conduct and performance.
- Simplifying protocol designs is necessary to mitigate negative effects on study efficiency and outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Study Design in Statistics
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches
