Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.

Critical Thinking I

Critical Thinking I

Critical thinking helps decision-making and allows nurses to recognize barriers to success and find solutions to possible issues. It helps to brainstorm and implement ideas to achieve goals. Critical thinking helps acknowledge and state workflow inefficiencies while improving management techniques. Nurses understand the value of critical thinking and look for fellow nurses with critical thinking skills to upgrade their professional standards. Critical thinking can advance a nurse's career with...

Patient-centered Care

Patient-centered Care

Patient-centered care involves delivering care beyond inpatient hospitalization. Reflective practice can enhance a patient-centered approach. Reflective practice is a process of reasoning that considers all aspects of the present situation, including practicalities, learning from personal practice, and consideration of patient needs. Patients appreciate care decisions made while considering their input. Involving the patient in their care provides the patient with a sense of contribution rather...

Group Design

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...

Critical Thinking II

Critical Thinking II

Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Letter from Dr. Perry; Gastro-Intestinal Catarrh.

Daniel's Texas medical journal·2023

Same author

Selected Sumaries.

Acta clinica Belgica·2016

Same author

Roles and responsibilities of team members in the functional capacity evaluation and rehabilitation of the injured worker.

Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation·2014

Same author

Functional capacity evaluation as a facilitator of social security disability program reform.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2014

Same author

Rehabilitation ergonomists: standards for development.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2014

Same author

The importance of a person-centered ecological approach to rehabilitation ergonomics: reply to Rice.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2014

Same journal

Perplexing Pubic Pain: How Clinicians Might Approach Assessing and Managing Pubic-Related Groin Pain in Athletes.

The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy·2026

Same journal

Prevalence of Symphyseal Radiographic Findings and Skeletal Maturity and Their Relationship With Groin Symptoms in PROfessional FEmale Football Players: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy·2026

Same journal

Rehabilitation of Long-Standing Groin Pain in Athletes: A Scoping Review of Exercise Content and Reporting.

The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy·2026

Same journal

Could Hip Dysplasia Be the Problem?

The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy·2026

Same journal

Understanding Adult Hip Dysplasia: Clinical Presentation, Assessment Techniques, and Exercise-Driven Management Strategies.

The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy·2026

Same journal

Hip Muscle Strength Is Associated With Symptom Severity in People With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome, but Only in Those With Preexisting Hip Muscle Weakness: A Secondary Analysis of Baseline Data From a Randomized Controlled Trial.

The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 30, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

Critically reading a research article*.

D L Hart, W R Poston, J F Perry

The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy

|January 1, 1980

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a method for critically appraising research articles, focusing on question format, validity, statistics, and conclusions to enhance patient care. This approach is valuable for physical therapy literature reviews.

More Related Videos

Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding

Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding

Published on: October 11, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 30, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding

Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding

Published on: October 11, 2018

Area of Science:

Research Methodology
Evidence-Based Practice
Scientific Literature Appraisal

Background:

Critically evaluating research is essential for evidence-based practice in healthcare.
Understanding the nuances of research design and statistical application improves clinical decision-making.
Students require structured methods for literature appraisal to develop critical thinking skills.

Purpose of the Study:

To present a systematic method for critically reading and evaluating research articles.
To emphasize key components of research appraisal: question formulation, validity, statistical analysis, and conclusion justification.
To provide a clinically relevant framework for assessing the applicability of research findings to patient care.

Main Methods:

Focus on the research question's format and clarity.
Assessment of internal and external validity through variable control.
Application of fundamental statistical principles.
Evaluation of the investigator's justification for conclusions.

Main Results:

The proposed method provides a structured approach to literature critique.
It effectively guides users in assessing the quality and relevance of research.
The method has been successfully implemented in physical therapy education.

Conclusions:

A systematic approach to reading research enhances critical appraisal skills.
This method promotes the translation of research findings into improved patient care.
The framework is a valuable tool for healthcare professionals and students seeking to utilize scientific literature effectively.