Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2026

Ultrasound Assessment of Endothelial-Dependent Flow-Mediated Vasodilation of the Brachial Artery in Clinical Research
Published on: October 22, 2014
Endothelial functional and structural impairment in patients with different degrees of coronary artery disease
1Clinic of Cardiology, University Hospital Alexandrovska, 1 Georgi Sofiiski Str., Sofia, 1431, Bulgaria. ianahr@yahoo.com
Insights
Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) and intima-media thickness (IMT) predict coronary artery disease (CAD) severity. Lower FMD and higher IMT indicate significant stenosis, though their correlation is weak and inconsistent.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Diagnostic Imaging
- Vascular Biology
Background:
- Noninvasive assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD) is crucial for patient management.
- Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) and intima-media thickness (IMT) are established markers of endothelial function and atherosclerosis.
- Understanding the relationship and prognostic value of FMD and IMT in varying degrees of CAD is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the correlation between FMD and IMT in patients with different severities of CAD.
- To determine the prognostic significance of FMD and IMT for detecting significant coronary artery stenosis.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 198 patients was categorized into five groups based on CAD severity.
- Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) and intima-media thickness (IMT) were measured in all participants.
- Coronary arteriography (CAG) was performed in 146 patients to assess significant coronary artery stenosis.
Main Results:
- Patients with significant coronary artery stenosis (> or = 50%) exhibited lower FMD (2.78% vs 8.24%) and higher IMT (0.882 mm vs 0.763 mm) compared to those without significant CAD (P < 0.001 for both).
- A weak negative correlation was observed between FMD and IMT (r = 0.242, P < 0.001), which diminished after adjusting for CAD severity.
- FMD values <= 4.5% and IMT values >= 0.81 mm demonstrated acceptable sensitivity and specificity for predicting significant CAD.
Conclusions:
- Advanced CAD is associated with reduced FMD and increased IMT.
- The correlation between FMD and IMT is weak and inconsistent across different CAD severities.
- Both FMD and IMT serve as valuable, albeit imperfect, prognostic indicators for the presence of significant coronary artery stenosis.
Abstract:
Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) and intima-media thickness (IMT) are noninvasive methods for patient evaluation. In this study we aimed to estimate the correlation between FMD and IMT in patients with different degree of coronary artery disease (CAD) development, and to explore their prognostic significance for the presence of angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis. We included 198 patients divided into five groups according to the degree of CAD development. All patients had FMD and IMT measured, 105 (53.03%) performed a Treadmill test in our clinic, and 146 (73.7%) underwent coronary arteriography (CAG). Patients with significant (> or = 50%) coronary artery stenosis had lower FMD and higher IMT values compared to patients without significant CAD: FMD: 2.78% +/- 2.71% vs 8.24% +/- 5.16%, respectively, P < 0.001; IMT: 0.882 +/- 0.17 mm vs 0.763 +/- 0.16 mm, respectively, P < 0.001. There existed a weak negative correlation between FMD and IMT (correlation coefficient: 0.242, P < 0.001), which was lost in subgroups and after controlling for the presence of significant CAD, number of diseased coronary arteries, and percent coronary artery stenosis. Analyzing the receiver operating characteristic curves we found that FMD values < or = 4.5% had 74% sensitivity, 77% specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) 81.8%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 68%, and IMT values > or = 0.81 mm had sensitivity 71%, specificity 67%, PPV 76.1%, and NPV 63.1% for the presence of significant CAD. Patients with advanced CAD had lower FMD and higher IMT values compared to patients with minor changes. The correlation between FMD and IMT was weak and inconsistent. Both methods demonstrated an acceptable prognostic significance for the presence of significant CAD.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Peripheral Artery Disease I: Introduction
Atherosclerosis I: Introduction