Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Semantic Relevance of a Conditioned Stimulus Does Not Enhance Fear Extinction Beyond Temporal Proximity to the Unconditioned Stimulus.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same author

A data-informed multidimensional composite score for stress assessment.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same author

The Effect of Extinction Training With Unpaired US and US Only Presentations on the Contextual Renewal of Human Fear Conditioning.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same author

From inhibition to excitation and why: The role of temporal urgency in modulating corticospinal activity.

Biological psychology·2026
Same author

Endocannabinoids in Saliva: Origins, Significance, and Research Directions.

Cannabis and cannabinoid research·2026
Same author

The positive facial expression advantage: Facilitated recognition of surprise, pride, and awe.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 30, 2026

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

Modality-specific attentional startle modulation during continuous performance tasks: a brief time is sufficient.

Sakinah S J Alhadad1, Ottmar V Lipp, Helena M Purkis

  • 1School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Queensland, 4072, Australia. s.alhadad@psy.uq.edu.au

Psychophysiology
|October 1, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Introducing trial structures into continuous performance tasks (CPTs) did not make attentional startle modulation modality nonspecific. Instead, modality-specific effects were strongest in trial-based CPTs, challenging previous findings.

More Related Videos

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 30, 2026

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Attention Research

Background:

  • Attentional startle modulation, a measure of cognitive processing, has shown modality-specific effects in continuous performance tasks (CPTs).
  • Conversely, modality-nonspecific effects were observed in trial-structured tasks, suggesting task structure influences attentional mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if imposing a trial structure on a visual CPT alters attentional blink modulation.
  • To determine if task continuity is essential for specific attentional mechanisms.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1: Participants performed a visual CPT under continuous (CONT), mixed-stimulus (MIXED), or discrete-trial (DISC) conditions.
  • Attentional startle modulation was measured using acoustic startle responses during target and nontarget stimuli.
  • Experiment 2: Confirmed findings in the DISC group, focusing on the initial stimulus presentation within task periods.

Main Results:

  • Contrary to hypotheses, modality-specific attentional startle modulation (smaller startle to targets than nontargets) was most pronounced in the MIXED and DISC groups.
  • This pattern was replicated in the initial stimulus presentation of the DISC condition in Experiment 2.
  • The continuous nature of the task was not found to be critical for engaging these attentional mechanisms.

Conclusions:

  • Imposing trial structures on CPTs does not necessarily lead to modality-nonspecific attentional startle modulation.
  • The findings suggest that task structure interacts with attentional mechanisms in complex ways, challenging established assumptions.
  • Attentional mechanisms engaged may not solely depend on the continuous nature of task performance.