Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Transcription Factors02:16

Transcription Factors

Tissue-specific transcription factors contribute to diverse cellular functions in mammals. For example, the gene for beta globin, a major component of hemoglobin, is present in all cells of the body. However, it is only expressed in red blood cells because the transcription factors that can bind to the promoter sequences of the beta globin gene are only expressed in these cells. Tissue-specific transcription factors also ensure that mutations in these factors may impair only the function of...
Transcription Factors02:16

Transcription Factors

Tissue-specific transcription factors contribute to diverse cellular functions in mammals. For example, the gene for beta globin, a major component of hemoglobin, is present in all cells of the body. However, it is only expressed in red blood cells because the transcription factors that can bind to the promoter sequences of the beta globin gene are only expressed in these cells. Tissue-specific transcription factors also ensure that mutations in these factors may impair only the function of...
General Transcription Factors01:30

General Transcription Factors

Tissue-specific transcription factors contribute to diverse cellular functions in mammals. For example, the gene for beta globin, a major component of hemoglobin, is present in all cells of the body. However, it is only expressed in red blood cells because the transcription factors that can bind to the promoter sequences of the beta globin gene are only expressed in these cells. Tissue-specific transcription factors also ensure that mutations in these factors may impair only the function of...
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
RNA Polymerase II Accessory Proteins02:36

RNA Polymerase II Accessory Proteins

Proteins that regulate transcription can do so either via direct contact with RNA Polymerase or through indirect interactions facilitated by adaptors, mediators, histone-modifying proteins, and nucleosome remodelers. Direct interactions to activate transcription is seen in bacteria as well as in some eukaryotic genes. In these cases, upstream activation sequences are adjacent to the promoters, and the activator proteins interact directly with the transcriptional machinery. For example, in...
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators02:13

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

Transcriptional regulators bind to specific cis-regulatory sequences in the DNA to regulate gene transcription. These cis-regulatory sequences are very short, usually less than ten nucleotide pairs in length. The short length means that there is a high probability of the exact same sequence randomly occurring throughout the genome.  Since regulators can also bind to groups of similar sequences, this further increases the chances of random binding. Transcriptional regulators form dimers that...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Genome-wide absolute quantification of chromatin looping.

Nature structural & molecular biology·2026
Same author

Live-cell imaging of enhancer-promoter dynamics reveals transient contact-driven gene activation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Active RNA synthesis patterns nuclear condensates.

Cell systems·2026
Same author

Cohesin bridging as a physical principle of enhancer-promoter communication.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Genetically homogeneous sector morphologies emerge from anisotropic colony growth.

Physical review. E·2026
Same author

Minimal model of self-organized clusters with phase transitions in ecological communities.

Physical review. E·2026
Same journal

Correction to 'scSuperAnnotator: A platform for benchmarking comparison and visualizing automated cellular annotation methods for scRNA-seq data'.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same journal

Correction to 'Differentiable partition function calculation for RNA'.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same journal

Deployment of non-canonical splicing in tunicate genomes is mediated by divergent U2AF function and changing m6A modification in U1 and U6 snRNA.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same journal

Bacillus subtilis DnaB forms multiple protein-protein interactions essential for DNA replication initiation.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same journal

Multiple forms of protein-protein and DNA binding are exhibited by BrxC from the BREX phage restriction system.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same journal

Biosynthesis of glycosylated 5-hydroxycytosine in the DNA of diverse viruses.

Nucleic acids research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 29, 2026

High Sensitivity Measurement of Transcription Factor-DNA Binding Affinities by Competitive Titration Using Fluorescence Microscopy
06:38

High Sensitivity Measurement of Transcription Factor-DNA Binding Affinities by Competitive Titration Using Fluorescence Microscopy

Published on: February 7, 2019

Predicting transcription factor specificity with all-atom models.

Sahand J Rahi1, Peter Virnau, Leonid A Mirny

  • 1Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.

Nucleic Acids Research
|October 3, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new computational method for predicting DNA binding sites for transcription factors (TFs) using protein-DNA complex structures. The approach accurately identifies specific DNA sequences by analyzing energy calculations, not prior binding data.

More Related Videos

Structure-Based Simulation and Sampling of Transcription Factor Protein Movements along DNA from Atomic-Scale Stepping to Coarse-Grained Diffusion
09:17

Structure-Based Simulation and Sampling of Transcription Factor Protein Movements along DNA from Atomic-Scale Stepping to Coarse-Grained Diffusion

Published on: March 1, 2022

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 29, 2026

High Sensitivity Measurement of Transcription Factor-DNA Binding Affinities by Competitive Titration Using Fluorescence Microscopy
06:38

High Sensitivity Measurement of Transcription Factor-DNA Binding Affinities by Competitive Titration Using Fluorescence Microscopy

Published on: February 7, 2019

Structure-Based Simulation and Sampling of Transcription Factor Protein Movements along DNA from Atomic-Scale Stepping to Coarse-Grained Diffusion
09:17

Structure-Based Simulation and Sampling of Transcription Factor Protein Movements along DNA from Atomic-Scale Stepping to Coarse-Grained Diffusion

Published on: March 1, 2022

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology
  • Structural biology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Transcription factors (TFs) regulate gene expression by binding to specific DNA operator sites.
  • Predicting TF binding sites typically requires prior knowledge of known binding sequences.
  • An ab initio approach, independent of prior binding data, is needed for broader TF binding site prediction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the feasibility of using structure-based energy calculations for ab initio prediction of TF DNA binding sites.
  • To evaluate the accuracy of atomistic models in distinguishing cognate from noncognate DNA sites for the PurR transcription factor from Escherichia coli.
  • To compare the performance of this structure-based approach against traditional bioinformatic methods.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized structure-based energy calculations on protein-DNA complexes without prior knowledge of bound sites.
  • Studied the PurR transcription factor from Escherichia coli.
  • Systematically evaluated the approach by comparing it with bioinformatic methods and testing against random DNA sequences and homologous TFs.
  • Analyzed the impact of experimental mutations in both DNA and the protein.

Main Results:

  • Structure-based energy calculations can effectively distinguish between cognate and noncognate DNA sites for the PurR TF.
  • The specificity of PurR binding is primarily determined by direct protein-DNA interactions.
  • DNA bending plays a minimal role in the specificity of PurR binding.

Conclusions:

  • Structure-based energy calculations offer a viable ab initio approach for predicting transcription factor binding sites.
  • Direct protein-DNA interactions are the dominant factor in determining TF binding specificity.
  • This method advances computational prediction of gene regulation mechanisms.