Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Cue-based feeding for preterm infants: a prospective trial
Barbara Puckett1, Vaneeta Kaur Grover, Tanya Holt
1Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon Health Region, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada. Barbara.Puckett@saskatoonhealthregion.ca
Insights
Cue-based oral feeding for premature infants resulted in shorter hospital stays and fewer adverse events compared to traditional methods. This approach achieved similar growth rates without increasing nursing workload, demonstrating its effectiveness and safety.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal care
- Pediatric nutrition
- Clinical research
Background:
- Traditional feeding regimens for premature infants often involve scheduled gavage and bottle feeding.
- Assessing alternative feeding strategies is crucial for improving infant outcomes and optimizing resource utilization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of cue-based oral feeding in premature infants (< 36 weeks post-conceptual age).
- To compare outcomes between cue-based feeding and traditional feeding regimens, including growth, length of stay, and adverse events.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial involving premature infants (< 36 weeks post-conceptual age).
- Two groups: a control group (traditional feeding) and an intervention group (cue-based oral feeding).
- Outcomes measured included weight gain, length of stay, post-conceptual age at discharge, and adverse events.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in mean weight gain between the groups (12.5 gm/kg/day vs. 12.1 gm/kg/day).
- Significantly shorter length of stay in the intervention group (10.0 days) compared to the control group (14.5 days; P = 0.009).
- Significantly fewer adverse events in the intervention group (3.5 events) versus the control group (12.5 events; P = 0.007).
Conclusions:
- Cue-based oral feeding is a viable and effective method for premature infants.
- This feeding strategy leads to reduced hospitalization duration and fewer adverse events without compromising infant growth.
- Cue-based feeding does not increase nursing workload, offering a beneficial alternative to traditional feeding regimens.
Abstract:
We set out to test whether premature infants were able to be fed orally on feeding cues and be discharged home earlier than infants fed by traditional feeding regimens. Attainment of adequate growth, adverse events, and nursing time to provide care were also assessed. After screening, the recruited premature infants (< 36 wks post-conceptual age [PCA]) were divided into two feeding regimens. A control group of 40 infants was fed using an initial combination of scheduled gavage and bottle feeding and then graduating to demand feeds. The intervention group comprised 39 neonates who had gavage feeds discontinued at study entrance and fed orally on cues. Outcomes measured were: weight gain in grams/kg/day, length of stay (in days) after enrollment, PCA on entrance and at discharge, adverse events during feeding, number of cues per feed in the intervention group, and resource utilization using nurse/patient ratios. Differences between groups were evaluated using Mann-Whitney U test, Fisher's exact test, and regression analysis. Two-tailed P values of < 0.05 were considered significant. There was no difference between groups in the mean weight gain; in the control group mean weight gain was 12.5 gm/kg/day and in the intervention group 12.1 gm/kg/day ( P = 0.83). The average length of stay in the control group of 14.5 days was significantly longer than the 10.0 days in the intervention group ( P = 0.009). This difference remained significant after adjusting for gestational age at birth in regression analysis. The average total number of adverse events in the control group (12.5 events) was significantly greater than in the intervention group (3.5 events; P = 0.007). The mean PCA on study entry was 34.4 wks in both groups and on exit 36.5 wks in the control group and 35.8 wks in the intervention group, a significant difference ( P = 0.02), The intervention group elicited 2.8 cues/feed. The nurse to patient ratios was equal in both groups throughout the study period. Cue-based feeding was possible for premature infants with similar weight gain as traditional feeding without affecting workload. Hospitalization and adverse events were decreased.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube through...

