Related Experiment Videos

The treatment of small acoustic tumors: now or later?

C Shelton1, W E Hitselberger

  • 1House Ear Institute, Los Angeles, Calif.

The Laryngoscope
|September 1, 1991
PubMed

Insights

Early surgical removal of small acoustic tumors is recommended. This approach preserves hearing in 67% and maintains normal facial function in 97% of patients, with no permanent operative morbidity.

Area of Science:

  • Neurosurgery
  • Otolaryngology
  • Neurology

Background:

  • Acoustic tumors (vestibular schwannomas) historically had high mortality with surgical removal.
  • Management evolved from observation to surgical intervention as diagnostic tools improved.
  • Gadolinium-enhanced MRI enables early detection of small, intracanalicular tumors, prompting debate on observation versus early removal.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review outcomes of early surgical removal for small acoustic tumors (≤0.5 cm).
  • To assess hearing preservation and facial nerve function after middle fossa acoustic tumor removal.
  • To advocate for early surgical intervention based on favorable results.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 39 acoustic tumors removed via middle fossa approach between 1961 and June 1989.
  • Tumors measured 0.5 cm or less.
  • Assessment of hearing preservation and facial nerve function at 1 year postoperatively.

Main Results:

  • Measurable hearing was preserved in 67% of patients.
  • Normal or near-normal facial function was achieved in 97% of patients at 1 year.
  • No permanent operative morbidity was reported.

Conclusions:

  • Early surgical removal of small acoustic tumors is advocated.
  • The middle fossa approach facilitates hearing preservation and excellent facial nerve outcomes.
  • Favorable results support proactive surgical management of incidentally discovered small acoustic tumors.

Related Concept Videos