Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Repeat intervention after invasive treatment of coronary arteries
Pertti Loponen1, Kari Korpilahti, Michael Luther
1Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Vaasa Central Hospital, Vaasa, Finland.
Insights
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is less invasive than coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) but often requires repeat procedures. Patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD) should consider long-term revascularization needs when choosing between PCI and CABG.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Health Outcomes Research
Background:
- Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are common revascularization strategies for coronary artery disease (CAD).
- Patients undergoing initial successful revascularization may require subsequent invasive procedures.
- Long-term outcomes and repeat intervention rates differ between CABG and PCI, impacting patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the rates of repeat invasive procedures and revascularization following initial PCI versus CABG in patients with multi-vessel CAD.
- To evaluate the factors contributing to repeat interventions in both treatment groups.
- To inform clinical decision-making for revascularization strategies in CAD.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 662 coronary artery diseased (CAD) patients.
- 36-month follow-up period to assess outcomes.
- Comparison of repeat angiography, repeat PCI, and repeat CABG rates between initial PCI and CABG groups.
Main Results:
- Thirty-day mortality was 1.0% for CABG and 0% for PCI (p=0.094).
- Repeat angiography was significantly higher in the PCI group (57.7%) vs CABG group (4.3%) (p<0.001).
- Repeat PCI (20.7% vs 3.2%, p<0.001) and repeat CABG (6.9% vs 0.7%, p<0.001) were more frequent after initial PCI. Cox regression showed hazard ratios for repeat PCI and repeat CABG were 8.5 (CI 3.7-19.5) and 9.5 (CI 2.2-40.0) respectively, compared to initial CABG.
Conclusions:
- While PCI offers lower in-hospital mortality, it is associated with a significantly higher likelihood of repeat invasive procedures.
- Factors for repeat intervention after PCI include in-stent restenosis and plaque progression.
- Factors for repeat intervention after CABG include graft complications and disease progression.
- The need for future revascularization should be a key consideration in choosing between PCI and CABG for multi-vessel CAD.
Objective:
Patients who undergo successful revascularisation either with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may subsequently require repeat invasive procedures.
Methods:
A cohort of 662 coronary artery diseased (CAD) patients was retrospectively reviewed. Follow-up was 36 months.
Results:
Thirty-day mortality was 1.0% in the CABG group (n=302) and 0% in the PCI group (n=360) (p=0.094). Overall 3-year survival for the cohort was 95.0% (NS). In addition to repeat angiographies (cumulative frequency 57.7% for PCI vs 4.3% for CABG, p<0.001) patients underwent both repeat PCI (20.7% vs 3.2%, p<0.001) and repeat CABG (6.9% vs 0.7%, p<0.001) during the follow-up. In Cox regression analysis hazard ratio (HR) for repeat PCI after initial PCI was 8.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.7-19.5, p<0.001 and for repeat CABG 9.5, CI 2.2-40.0, p=0.002 in comparison to initial CABG. In-stent restenosis and progression of atherosclerotic plaques in native vessels were reasons for repeat intervention among the PCI patients. Complications with bypass grafts together with progression of the underlying disease were factors for re-interventions after CABG.
Conclusions:
PCI is far less invasive and may have lower in-hospital mortality rates than CABG. However, the highly likely need for repeat invasive procedures and revascularisation has to be taken into consideration when choosing an invasive approach for multi vessel CAD patients.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
